Search for: "Hopes v. Davis"
Results 281 - 300
of 722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 2:35 pm
Davis. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 5:50 am
” Hawkins v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:08 am
Kim Davis, the county clerk in Kentucky who was jailed for five days for refusing to give marriage licenses to same-sex couples may now face a copyright lawsuit. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 12:06 pm
GrahamQuartavious Davis v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
And please note: Kim Davis never, at any point in her public statements, claimed any such power. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:54 am
Is this guy trying to match wits with Kim Davis over in Kentucky? [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
One of the most intriguing cases on the Supreme Court’s docket this fall is Foster v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 10:37 am
The Alice decision, and its companion, Octane Fitness v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Within hours of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:29 pm
We hope the California Supreme Court will recognize the importance of this case, grant review, and reverse the lower court ruling to shine a light on this massive surveillance program. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
This opinion goes a very long way toward cutting back the expansive definition of "testimonial" statements - and therefore the range of evidence excluded by the Confrontation Clause - that had been stated in Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Jennifer Davis: maybe no empirical evidence is ever probative—different approaches include psychologists, polling, neurologists, linguists. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
