Search for: "House v. House" Results 281 - 300 of 41,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm by Robert Black
Congress certainly has the authority under Article V of the Constitution to set and change deadlines for the ratification of constitutional amendments, and has done so on numerous occasions. [read post]
AB 1505 restores the authority of cities and counties to require the inclusion of affordable housing in new rental housing projects, thereby superseding the 2009 decision of Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P., et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:31 am
Weintraub has written a fairly critical  note on the House of Lords judgment in Harding v Wealands  in the current issue (Spring 2007) of the Texas International Law Journal, entitled, “Choice of Law for Quantification of Damages: A Judgment of the House of Lords Makes a Bad Rule Worse” (42 Tex. [...] [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:11 am
§ 230 content provider immunity opinion, Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:20 am
R (Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (JUSTICE intervening) [2008] UKHL 60; [2008] WLR (D) 267 “Where, following threats by a foreign state as to the consequences, affecting national security, if he pursued an investigation into alleged corruption, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office had discontinued it, he had been entitled in his discretion to do so. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 7:34 am by Zoe Gujral
The text of Article V of the Constitution does not speak to whether Congress can retroactively remove a deadline. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:11 am
The case of Mexfield Housing Co-Operative v Berrisford [2009] EWHC 2392 (Ch) illustrates the potentially precarious situation in which the tenant of a fully-mutual Housing Co-operative may find themselves. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 11:31 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued an opinion in Freedom from Religion Foundation v. [read post]