Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC" Results 281 - 300 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
 Hugh Tomlinson QC received rather kinder treatment in a Saturday Guardian profile. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
The Freedom of Information Act has become a powerful tool for journalists and campaigners at both local and national levels seeking to reveal the workings of the state. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
  The background is considered in more detail in a series of earlier blog posts by Hugh Tomlinson QC under the title “Privacy – the Way Ahead? [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege.   [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
As Hugh Tomlinson QC notes on the Inforrm blog, it’s a ‘difficult’ case, ‘which is likely to produce a definitive restatement of the principles which apply when a party is seeking to derogate from the principles of open justice’. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The case was covered by Hugh Tomlinson QC in the following Inforrm post. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am by INFORRM
Sweden, Copyright versus Freedom of Expression II – Dirk Voorhoof and Inger Høedt-Rasmussen Briefing Note on Exemplary Damages and Costs – Gill Phillips The fundamental right to insult our leaders: Three worrying cases in France, the West Bank and right here – Adam Wagner Leveson, Article 10 and Apologies: another red herring – Hugh Tomlinson QC Privacy, Monstering and the Press: the case of Lucy Meadows The Leveson press freedom law that the… [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am by INFORRM
In deciding whether or not to grant the injunction the Court will first consider whether a reasonable person, in all the circumstances, would regard each item of information as “confidential” or “private”; if satisfied, the Court will then consider whether there is, in any event, some proper justification for publication of the information (for a fuller discussion see Hugh Tomlinson QC’s post ‘Part 1: Privacy Law – the way ahead? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
Journalism and regulation Last week on Inforrm, Hugh Tomlinson QC considered whether compulsory regulation of the print media could be compatible with Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The inauguration of President Donald J Trump on 20 January 2017 was the biggest media story in the world this week. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The “News of the World” took centre stage at the Leveson Inquiry last week, with evidence from former NoW journalists Mazher Mahmood, Neil Wallis, Neville Thurlbeck, Colin Myler and Daniel Sanderson, lawyers Lawrence Abramson (formerly of Harbottle & Lewis) and Julian Pike (of Farrer & Co), former NoW in-house lawyers Tom Crone and Jon Chapman, and the private investigator Derek Webb. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am by INFORRM
In this case, suppose the facts relied on were the commenter’s knowledge that the QC had an ‘open relationship’ with her husband, whereby both parties occasionally had sex with other people, with their spouse’s full knowledge and consent. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
Also of interest here is this post by Hugh Tomlinson QC, who disagrees with Chakrabarti and points out that she has been misrepresented (she did not, in fact, say that the Leveson proposals, if enacted, would be illegal or incompatible with the HRA). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Jay QC said he could not understand Hunt’s fears that a statutory framework would stifle press freedom after the chairman said he was concerned such a body would result in “censorship and licensing”. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
We had a post about this case by Hugh Tomlinson QC. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am by INFORRM
” There was a post about the case on the Inforrm Blog by Hugh Tomlinson QC “Case Law: R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales, Police use of “automatic facial recognition technology unlawful”. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Events Anya Proops QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jorge Oliveira, Head of Data Protection at FIFA, are running a remote panel session for LawInSport’s annual conference on Tuesday 7 November 2021. [read post]