Search for: "Humane Society of the United States v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 2,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
In what has become a ritualized performance over the years, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered his statement for the opening of the 32nd session of the U.N. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
Our constitution guarantees certain rights, and recognizes that other rights exist, from the state of humanity itself. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down its long anticiated ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm by Sam Murrant
A post on the Freemovement blog on the recent case of Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department states that just that may be happening in a subset of immigration cases. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:29 am
The sixth amendment of the United States Constitution provides in part, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed..." [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am by INFORRM
Instead, the European Court went on to find that the interference in this case was not “necessary in a democratic society”. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm by Adam Wagner
THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04 Will the Human Rights Act survive the General Election? [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  We have already posted about the most recent, MGN v United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am by INFORRM
The court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices in circumstances where state authorities are seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society [58-59]. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 1:54 am by Adam Wagner
 In a letter to HM, the Secretary of State accepted that the appellant had an established private life, but a family life in the United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am by Timothy Edgar
  The closest analogy for Mueller’s decision to charge the Russian trolls is probably the May 2014 indictment in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:04 pm
The criminal codes of the United States and of all 50 states have many similarities and some definable differences between them. [read post]
  Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by Suzanne Lambert
The nature of the balancing exercise has been the subject of lengthy judicial consideration at the highest level of domestic courts (see, for example, R(Razgar) v SSHD [2004] UKHL 27 and Huang v SSHD [2007] UKHL 11) and it is right that the interest to be balanced against that of Mr Ibrahim and his family is that of the general public or society, not of individual members of it. [read post]