Search for: "I.S. V. STATE"
Results 281 - 300
of 17,505
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
That simple and logical proposition was too much for this panel to bear, however, because of the societal “value” it perceived in the information at stake (i.e., tracing immigrants). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 7:25 am
NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:09 am
Times v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
State of New York et al v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:09 am
Principal place of business and, if that address is not in the United States, the primary location of the company in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
More precisely Article 7 (2) of the Brussels Ia Regulation had to be interpreted, according to which a person domiciled in a Member State may be sued in another Member State, ‘in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 11:30 pm
Unfortunately, in cases like Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited (MCSN) v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
While many states look to Delaware as an authority on issues of corporate law, companies that are incorporated in other states should consult with local counsel to ensure that any relevant differences are taken into consideration. [2] See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
So for that issue, absent anything new (like the Supreme Court stepping in and saying that its earlier dicta about the scope of state law in Viking River Cruises was correct), we pretty much know at this point how these things will go in both federal and state court.Judge Lee adds a concurrence that has little to do with the substance of the court's holding but that he nonetheless feels is important to add just so employers don't potentially get stuck with issue… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Supreme Court, and another in Ohio state court. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
The case of Ellison v. [read post]
