Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS"
Results 281 - 300
of 497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 9:19 am
Notice of appeal was filed about 4 1/2 hours after the opinion & order was issued. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
The Legislature last took up the topic in 2009, in response to a lawsuit alleging that the state Department of Correction adopted its lethal-injection procedure without following the Arkansas Administrative Procedures Act, which requires state agencies to give public notice of and take comments on new rules. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
The 9th Circuit then remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm
With mounting outrage, rebuked employers and noncitizen workers are channeling Howard Beale from the venerable film Network, and screaming, “We’re as mad as hell, and we’re not going to take this anymore! [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:14 am
July 3, 2013) (en banc) Panel opinion discussed here. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:58 pm
Here’s what we’re watching: Opportunity to Work Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Bonin, No. 07-30827 In a case involving an individual previously arrested for making threats to country music singer George Strait and later for threats to a magistrate judge, an order committing defendant to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant to a dangerousness determination is vacated and remanded where the determination contravened the requisite statutory procedure. . [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Other jurisdictions have adopted much more stringent requirements to restrict marketing efforts by non-EU managers. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Such a practice also encourages filing of frivolous suits. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
[He] has no basis to apply his opinions reliably to the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
Appeals -- Preservation of issue -- Appeal alleging that circuit court had no procedural basis to enter final order -- Where nothing in plaintiff's appendix suggests he raised his procedural argument to the circuit court, and plaintiff has not provided a transcript of the hearing which led to the final order, the appellate court is forced to conclude that the plaintiff has not preserved his procedural argument -- Based on circuit court's factual findings, it… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Perez and Nickols arise from a suit brought by the Mortgage Bankers Association to invalidate a Department of Labor interpretive rule, and ask whether the Administrative Procedure Act categorically prohibits agencies from revising their interpretive rules unless such revisions are made through notice-and-comment rulemaking. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am
Then there are non-RULLCA states such as Delaware that regularly re-visit and update their business entity laws, while our New York legislators seemingly pay no attention. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
(F073634; nonpublished opinion; Stanislaus County Superior Court; 2006153.) [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
” Moving to the substantive claims, the appellate court held that the County violated CEQA because the 2016 Guidelines established a GHG threshold of significance without following the required adoption procedures. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Government Code section 11346.1(a)(2) requires that SWRCB wait at least five working days after providing the notice of proposed emergency action before submitting the proposed action to the OAL. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Government Code section 11346.1(a)(2) requires that SWRCB wait at least five working days after providing the notice of proposed emergency action before submitting the proposed action to the OAL. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 3:45 am
Investment firms are heavily involved in bidding wars and many properties are snapped up before they’re even listed. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Published Opinion, April 2, 2010 The published opinion. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 8:04 am
” In re Marriage of Karonis, 296 Ill. [read post]
