Search for: "IN RE ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES FOR THE NOTICE AND FILING OF OPINIONS"
Results 281 - 300
of 497
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
JUSTICE GUZMAN filed a concurring opinion, in which JUSTICE LEHRMANN and JUSTICE DEVINE joined. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
The proceeding begins with the issuance of a charging document, a Notice to Appear (formerly called an Order to Show Cause), an appearance in Immigration Court before an Immigration Judge. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:26 am
Judge Scirica filed a separate opinion in which he concurred in parts of the court’s analysis, but dissented from its decision to affirm the judgment of the district court (In re: Jevic Holding Corp., May 21, 2015, Hardiman, T.). [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Accordingly, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.113 is hereby adopted as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:56 pm
Accordingly, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.113 is hereby adopted as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:44 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Supreme Court, New York County, New York that analyzes an issue involving divorce procedure. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Opinion delivered: March 20, 2015. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Opinion delivered: March 20, 2015. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
However, in contrast to their fifteen-page Woodward dissent, this time, the Justices dissented without comment, declining even to cite their earlier opinion. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
Horn, Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-1484. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
It observed that this procedure "is consistent with those adopted by district courts in Hague Convention cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 5:01 am
” The IRS did not try to locate the taxpayer and did not re-issue the notice. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
MBA filed suit contending, as relevant here, that the Administrator’s Interpretation was procedurally invalid under the D. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
MBA filed suit contending, as relevant here, that the Administrator’s Interpretation was procedurally invalid under the D. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Third, even if the agency were able to re-adopt its deferred action program via notice-and-comment rulemaking in relatively short order, there is no guarantee that the outcome would be upheld. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
(A135892; nonpublished opinion; San Mateo County Superior Court; CIV508656.) [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Procedural HistoryContributor Note: Relevant procedural history has been summarized below. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Annual Re-Certification of CFTC Exemptions. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
The re-hearing took place on December 15, 2014 (oral argument available here) and the decision of the full court is still outstanding. [read post]
