Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 6-9(b)(5) OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT AND COURT OF APPEALS"
Results 281 - 300
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Id. at 5-6. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
” B. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cal. 2007): Jury verdict on 9/21/04 awarding $82M. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
The SEC also launched an investigation of credit rating agencies, and, on February 2, 2009, adopted amendments to the rules governing nationally recognized statistical rating organizations to address concerns about the integrity of the process by which rating agencies rate structured finance products.[12] The SEC has filed civil charges against a number of market participants. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
If certification is denied, these cases wither on the vine.[5] C. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:18 am
"Rule 3.851, Commentary re: 1993 Adoption. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Consider what follows as free legal torches and pitchforks for going after the Conte monster, should you be so lucky as to get a chance to convince another California Court of Appeal, create a conflict, and thus lay the groundwork for another attempt to convince the California Supreme Court that the jurisprudential underpinnings to products liability really do matter.We're also lazy. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:14 am
Dudas: - concerns the appeal of the claims and continuations rules promulgated by the USPTO which were preliminarily enjoined and ultimately permanently enjoined by the District Court. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
The Decree required the Commissioner to impose restrictions on trapping in Wildlife Management Districts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 11. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
The Arkansas Supreme Court enforced that rule in Kraemer v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Epps, No. 0860652 In an Eight Amendment challenge to lethal injection as the method of execution for two death-row inmates, rulings that the applicable statute of limitations barred plaintiffs' section 1983 action and grant of summary judgment to defendant are affirmed where: 1) under Wilson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
P. 9.030(a)(3) and Article V, § 3(b)(9), Fla. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, October 6, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 22, 2008 US v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
P. 12(b)(6) and 9(b). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Leveto, No. 05-4753 Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom battle:… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences: (Managing… [read post]
