Search for: "IN RE RULES FOR MANDATORY CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION" Results 281 - 300 of 386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 8:00 am by Doorey
 Senior Toyota management will have been huddled in an office with the lawyers for two days plotting their strategy and completing the mandatory legal forms. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:33 am
So, if the legality of the California rule isn’t the problem, what remains is pure policy. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ("Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Read literally, the notice is mandatory in an email establishing the time for any meeting to be convened under any DOE contract. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
With respect to legal custody, the court awarded the father decision-making authority, after consultation with the mother, over educational and medical issues. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 7:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A club with implicit rules and norms as well as explicit rules that ended up in the statute. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 11:35 pm by Daniel Richardson
  Legally, they’re still prisoners.And that’s how SCOV decides today’s case.Just notice how far afield we’ve gotten from the text of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
• Streamlining Legal Immigration: Our immigration system should reward anyone who is willing to work hard and play by the rules. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:53 pm by Ruby Powers
· Streamlining Legal Immigration: Our immigration system should reward anyone who is willing to work hard and play by the rules. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
Munsingwear, and thus improperly relied on the district court’s factual findings and legal rulings in an earlier case that was vacated as moot while on appeal, even though other courts of appeals have interpreted Munsingwear as rendering a vacated decision a nullity, as if it the case had never been filed, and draining its factual findings of all vitality; (2) whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit misconstrued Rule 60(b)(5) of the Federal… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Recent headlines and developments on global financial technology make this re-examination imperative. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Knopf
There are important issues at stake re what is “substantial” and what is “fair dealing”. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 1:13 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
However shameful the failure to update the waiting period for registry is, even worse is the 1996 law that created mandatory detention of immigrants without benefit of appointed counsel, as Prof. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:42 pm by Jeff Gamso
In particular, they dicked around with the state's mandatory continuing legal education requirements.Now, MCLE is inherently a bullshit scam.Ohio lawyers are required to obtain a minimum of 24 hours of approved continuing legal education every two years. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm by lawmrh
This past March, for instance, even the ABA Journal featured a Paradigm Shift Series, to show “how traditional U.S. legal education paradigms, driven by federal loan underwriting, are not responding to the market forces as law schools continue to add students and raise tuition rates in a mature legal services industry. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
(The precise rules about which laws have to be approved by the Bundesrat are quite obscure, and nobody seems to know them.) [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:01 am by tekEditor
In the short term, working over 21 hours continuously is equivalent to being legally drunk. [read post]