Search for: "IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF THOMAS" Results 281 - 300 of 459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  At that time Colorado had two strong Defense of Marriage provisions, one in the Constitution and the other statutory, not only barring the celebration of same-sex marriages in the state but denying in-state recognition to valid out-of-state same-sex marriages.[4]  The federal government had its own DOMA.[5]  But Massachusetts had recognized same-sex marriage.[6]Phillips met with them personally and, when he heard that the cake was intended as a… [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 6:33 am by Jaclene D'Agostino
  In In re Estate of Vallerius, 259 Ill App 3d 350 (5th Dist 1994), the decedent was murdered by two of her grandsons. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 is the appeal of Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:05 pm by Nassiri Law
Here again, California law extends some additional protections, but it’s better for everyone if they’re available uniformly. [read post]
26 Aug 2007, 6:48 am
“We’re seeing world-class companies coming out of emerging markets,” said Mr. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, another take on Masterpiece Cakeshop comes from Thomas Berg and Douglas Laycock, who filed an amicus brief focusing on the religion-clause issues in the case and who maintain that “[a]n objector … who raises a claim of conscience in the religiously significant context of a wedding should be protected as much as those on the other side of the culture war over marriage equality. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:27 am by Jon Hyman
(Don’t forget, we’re halfway through December, which means you only have two weeks left to vote for the ABA Journal’s Blawg 100. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:38 pm by Kevin Funnell
" He thinks the real focus of everyone's attention should be on a marriage made in hell: Big Banks and The Federal Government. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:44 pm
Now you understand why Elliot McGucken is quoted by the New York Times as an expert on art, video games, and many other things besides, and you’re not. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 12:53 am by Doug Cornelius
Thomas NYU Law’s Compliance & Enforcement blog Nearly ten years ago, following a global financial collapse spurred by serial wrongdoing, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:03 am by Jon Hyman
— from David Yamada’s Minding the Workplace You Can’t Be Sick Unless You’re Pre-Sick — from Frank Roche’s KnowHR Blog You Can’t Make This Stuff Up! [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am by Laura Sandwell
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 12:55 pm
That combo could make for an unpleasant afternoon/marriage. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Clients don’t like paying extra money for holdups with examination—many think it should be like going down to the courthouse to get a marriage license or dog license; since they’re using the mark, why aren’t they entitled to a registration? [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
Reasonable observers can understand that the Company might express negative views about such marriages while complying with its legal obligation to serve such customers. [read post]