Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J. A. C." Results 281 - 300 of 5,589
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2021, 10:23 pm by Gene Takagi
§ 301.9100-3: Organizations required to apply for tax-exempt status under §§ 505, 508, and 501(c)(29) and the regulations thereunder. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by Mark Astarita
“Alka and Dabney have made tremendous contributions to the Los Angeles Regional Office and the Division of Enforcement on numerous challenging and significant matters,” said Andrew J. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Utah): 98 San Juan County Motion to Dismiss 99 Navajo Nation Motion for Partial Summary J — Fourth Claim 100 Navajo Nation Motion for Partial Summary J — Second and Third Claims 101 Navajo Nation Opposition to 98 104 San Juan County 56d Motion 105 San Juan County Reply re 98 166 Memorandum Decision and Order An excerpt: Having established subject-matter jurisdiction and the joinder of all necessary parties, the court finds that Navajo Nation has provided… [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:09 pm
A Practitioner’s Guide on How Walter White Should Have Protected His Interests in Gray Matter, and His Litigation Options for Building an “Empire Business” Through the Courts, Not the CartelMichael C. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's Regulation C 205," citing… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's Regulation C 205," citing… [read post]