Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 281 - 300 of 8,689
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  House mark arguments are often made.Fromer: composite mark issues matter—Pretzel Crisps bag has a particular appearance; might come to mind for consumers even if they’re only being asked about the word mark. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[…]Thus the wetting degree does not appear to be suitable to clearly distinguish the subject-matter of claim 1 from the subject-matter of D1.Incidentally, we have discovered a more learned way of saying “wish claim”: just say “claim defining a desideratum”. ? [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
Compliance with statutory notice requirements represents a condition precedent to maintenance of a summary eviction proceeding (see 170 W. 85th St. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
She doesn’t think that’s a matter of free speech.Deutsch: all sorts of third party sites have provisions about copyright & TM etc; DMCA gives you obligations for takedown. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It didn’t matter that, if a user searches “royal silk,” the phrase will appear in the URL for the search page. [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:15 am by Joel A. Webber
  Part I of IV: Solving The More-w/-Less Dilemma Part II of IV: C-Suite Must Say What it Wants from Legal Part IV of IV: How the C-Suite Can Achieve a Re-Set [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
offers limits.Samuelson: Software IP lawyers say—w/demise of patentable subject matter after Alice, some say © needs to expand. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Regarding the possible inadmissibility of the appeal the Board referred also to decision T 844/05.[7] In its letters of 4 and 17 February 2011 the [applicant] did not address the issue of admissibility of the appeal as raised by the Board, other than by asking that the appeal be “permitted” and by supplying arguments, now regarding sufficiency of disclosure and clarity of the claims.[8] During the OPs before the Board the discussion therefore concentrated on the admissibility of… [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
Thus D1 discloses the subject-matter of the respective independent claims at issue. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:10 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  [W]e must maintain our spirit. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Instead, he relied on two references to Steripath’s regulatory status in an article and a presentation, although he didn’t know whether their authors would be involved in purchasing such a device. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:10 am by Above the Law
For the record, the George W. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:26 am
:[W]e hold that a constructive-discharge claim accrues—and the limitations period begins to run— when the employee gives notice of his resignation.Off the top of my head, I can't think of any reason why this analysis would not hold for analyzing the running of the statute of limitations in similar discrimination claims against private employers (but candidly admit that I have not had occasion to fully research that issue). [read post]