Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 281 - 300
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2007, 12:24 pm
LJ is actually a fabulous example of a hybrid form of social networking software that is doing interesting things with control over who can see what information, and possibly disturbing things like restricting the ability to search interests on the basis of content - certain "bad" terms can't be searched on at all. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The judge (Peter Jackson J) undertook a balance of interests under Articles 8 and 10. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 4:09 pm
In the meantime the Secretary of State for the Communities and Local Government was joined as an interested party. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 4:48 pm
The judgment is interesting for the extent of the judicial redaction of facts for publication, to ensure the family could not be identified. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Macur LJ concurred. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
Comment: free speech and hatred Although it is hard to disagree with Gross LJ that this is essentially an “immigration case” rather than a freedom of speech case, in the sense that the Secretary of State was required to consider whether Dr Naik , a non-national, should be permitted entry into this country, the public interest in freedom of expression naturally forms the focus of the debate. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Comment: free speech and hatred Although it is hard to disagree with Gross LJ that this is essentially an “immigration case” rather than a freedom of speech case, in the sense that the Secretary of State was required to consider whether Dr Naik , a non-national, should be permitted entry into this country, the public interest in freedom of expression naturally forms the focus of the debate. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
The next question to be considered was whether or not there had been an interference with the interest that had been determined to fall within the scope of Article 8(1) – in this case the interest in exercising in the open air. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am
TLU and TLV responded, maintaining that the Judge’s decisions should be upheld for the reasons that he gave, and with the further, interesting contention that, even if the data were not their personal data, they still had a right to compensation under section 13 of the 1998 Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
Yet Kitchin LJ took the opposite view - "Once again this is a factor which undermines Smith & Nephew's favoured interpretation of the claim. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am
As Arnold LJ clarified, these instances of accessio “all concern new tangible property which is produced by existing tangible property. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
It is noteworthy that the leading judgment is delivered by none other than the Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Terence Etherton (Jackson LJ and Kitchin LJ concurring). [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 2:45 am
Mummery LJ then goes on to explain what he means]. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 10:07 am
[and] in Ashai Medical v Macopharma [2002] EWCA Civ 466 (as per Aldous LJ at [21]). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
Where there is a sole name there is a rebuttable presumption that there is a sole beneficial interest, displaceable by evidence of common intention that both parties should have a beneficial interest. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
But first we need to find out what ‘public interest’ may mean in relation to copyright infringement.It is significant that while there is quite a bit of caselaw on the subject of a public interest defence for copyright infringement, much is very old, but it generally falls into two separate groupings. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 9:29 am
advocate through the political process for the public interest, as legislation arises? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
Kitchin LJ (¶ 28) suggests that the decision could be per incuriam, while Lloyd LJ (¶39) suggests that it is inconsistent with Agnew. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
McCombe LJ agreed (para 84). [read post]
