Search for: "In Re: B "
Results 281 - 300
of 30,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 7:50 am
The divide is about power—the political kind—and whether using distributed generation as a vehicle to decentralize power in the electric system is more likely to promote a) a more democratic system or b) a privatized system, concentrating power in the hands of those who can afford it while disinvesting from our current system of publicly-regulated provisioning. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If you’re looking to compare the laws of different jurisdictions, you can use our State Law Comparison Tool (under Tools & Resources at the right side of the practice area page) to compare laws on various topics. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
The Restoration and Re-Establishment: 1660-1701, Russell Sandberg (Cardiff University, UK)6. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
Stafford, 226 F.3d 275 (3d Cir. 2000); In re NVIDIA Sec. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
For example, in In re GoHealth, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:45 am
We’re now taking the industry to the next level with this week’s launch of our second-generation legal generative AI Assistant on Lexis+ AI. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Making or directing others to make public statements about known or reasonably foreseeable witnesses concerning their potential participation in the investigation or in this criminal proceeding; b. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
IV, § 2(B)(1)(g). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Mit seinem Standpunkt fördert der EDSA einen bürokratischen Leerlauf, ohne den Schutz der betroffenen Personen zu verbessern. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
“I’m really worried about that, because you’ve got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying the government can’t interact with the source of those problems. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:06 am
The corollary question concern whether the position is different where an appeal is filed before the application is withdrawn - in which case Article 139(2)(b) EUTMR is not triggered and the conversion process can proceed. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:35 am
If you’re a high earner, however, pass-through taxation could result in you leaving tax savings on the table. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
I wanted to go back and re-listen to Harriet Harman’s response to my query – but in fact that has gone too. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 8:48 am
So I mean, I’m sure that when you first read the report, you’re just yawning. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-China Economic and Security Review Commission“China and the Middle East”Testimony by:Jon B. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:16 pm
If they are a re-offender, they are also guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of 5 years in jail. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Additionally, we’re pleased to welcome Afruz Sayah as an Associate and Stephanie Cepeda as a Paralegal for the Corporate and Transactional practice group. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:02 am
You're welcome! [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:46 am
Whether you’re running a business from your US home or while living abroad, buckle up. [read post]
