Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2" Results 281 - 300 of 569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 27, 2024, in In re Yellow Corporation, et. al., Judge Craig T. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm by Carter Ruml
 Now, we’re disappointed to share bad news with In re Chilton, 2010 WL 817331 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Tex.) [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:10 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
  The court recognized that property settlement and equitable distribution debts were not priority debts and did not have to be paid in full, citing the case of In re Uzaldin, 418 B.R. 172 (Bkr. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 5:10 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
  The court recognized that property settlement and equitable distribution debts were not priority debts and did not have to be paid in full, citing the case of In re Uzaldin, 418 B.R. 172 (Bkr. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 1:11 pm by James H. Wilson, Jr.
  The court recognized that property settlement and equitable distribution debts were not priority debts and did not have to be paid in full, citing the case of In re Uzaldin, 418 B.R. 172 (Bkr. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:54 am by Frodnesor
In re National Gas Distributors, LLC, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 2135557 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:54 am by Frodnesor
In re National Gas Distributors, LLC, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 2135557 (Bankr. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Pa. 2003) passim In re Ormet Corp., 324 B.R. 645 (Bankr. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 8:19 pm
At least two bankruptcy court judges sitting in Massachusetts have permitted such bifurcations, see In re Brown, 175 B.R. 129 and In re Richards, 151 B.R. 8. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 3:47 am
Standard (In re Standard), 123 B.R. 444 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1991), noted it “generally describes certain relationships as confidential, the result of which is that parties in those relationships have greater reason to rely on representations of the other party. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:59 pm by doug
Debtor counsel’s first line of defense to this aggression is former bankruptcy judge Henry Boroff’s opinion in In re Mollison, 463 B.R. 169 (Bankr.D.Mass. 2012). [read post]