Search for: "In Re: City of Fall v."
Results 281 - 300
of 1,266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
“Rogue U.S. officer conduct falls within a familiar, not ‘new,’ Bivens setting. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Consider the city: if someone is libeling me on the sidewalk, I can’t sue the city. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
City of Dallas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Roughly twenty localities also have bans, including the City of Philadelphia, which passed the one challenged in this case.The Ruling in Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
., LP v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
The following is our testimony to Kansas’ Senate Committee on Assessment and Taxation; and Kansas’ House Committee on Taxation Presenting: Kansas Tax Modernization: A Framework for Stable, Fair, Pro-growth Reform Table of Contents Introduction Corporate Income Tax Individual Income Tax State and Local Sales Tax Property and Related Taxes Other Tax and Revenue Introduction Thank you for inviting us to present today before your committee, and for the openness and hospitality we… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm
They were re-arguing the issues already addressed in the original decision, and did not address the threshold question in any substantive way. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm
Thus was born the new and expansive presumption that labour relations fall under provincial authority and only exceptionally under federal authority, not because the Commissioners thought in a pe [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:20 am
I know we're not going to impose costs against the trial judge. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
First party regulatory claims do not fall within the scope of the 1985 Indemnity. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:01 am
(R.) v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
There is no doubt that this prohibition falls well within constitutional bounds. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The city is committed to to closing the book on that old rule and we're not going to take it into effect. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
United StatesVazzo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 8:53 am
In re A.L.C., 607 Fed. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
The policy of the current administration and head of the Antitrust Division is in some senses a re-balancing of the risk of hold up versus hold out. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am
v=lzatElTvT6U. [read post]
