Search for: "In Re: Equity 30 v."
Results 281 - 300
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2017, 3:39 pm
In Re Trulia Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
AB 2535 comes on the heels of the recent federal decision, Garnett v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 4:48 pm
On August 30, the much-publicized AB 1066 was sent to Governor Brown’s desk, where it currently awaits his action. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:23 pm
See pages 30 to 32. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
The SEC’s order finds that Morgan Stanley violated Rule 30(a) of Regulation S-P, also known as the “Safeguards Rule. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
CommentsThe Section’s comments are organized according to the 4 parts of the Draft Provisions on which the Section offers comments: (I) validity of resolutions by shareholder/board of director meetings; (II) shareholder right to be informed; (IV) preemptive rights; and (V) derivative lawsuits. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:16 pm
Fortunately, as illustrated by a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in The Sidney and North Saanich Memorial Park Society v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
Jones Capital Equities Management, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:43 pm
The support agreement anticipates a plan, which includes, among other things, a debt-for-equity conversion. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:21 pm
Oreal v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
This is evident in the court’s rulings in the cases of Gair v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Justice Emerson also pointed to the statement in the defendants’ responsive letter that “[y]ou are a 20% equity holder of this company. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Justice Emerson also pointed to the statement in the defendants’ responsive letter that “[y]ou are a 20% equity holder of this company. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Justice Emerson also pointed to the statement in the defendants’ responsive letter that “[y]ou are a 20% equity holder of this company. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:20 pm
I think there’s like 20 or 30 I’ve seen recently I’m sure there is more even than that. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm
In fact, on January 4, 2016, CalSTRS announced that it has contacted 30 US public firms asking them to adopt the so-called proxy access bylaw and noting that it was ready to submit shareholder proposals on the topic if companies failed to heed its request. [read post]
