Search for: "In Re: FDIC"
Results 281 - 300
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 10:06 pm
Other officials fear the FDIC rules are fostering an anti-business environment and crimping novel thinking. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
Considering that JPMorgan Chase paid only $1.9 billion for all of WaMu, in a shotgun marriage arranged by the FDIC, there presumably was plenty of room on the WaMu balance sheet to value this loan portfolio at a severe discount. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm
Whether or not Killinger et al. will ultimately prevail or will ultimately decide to settle, it seems they've reached the point where they're telling the FDIC that if its thinks it can prove a breach of duty of due care notwithstanding the prudent business judgment rule, then have at it, because the defendants aren't buying what the FDIC is selling in the way of a settlement offer. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:57 pm
Well, we're "checking bacK" and it looks like somebody ate the pudding. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 8:01 am
So what is FDIC supposed to do? [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:08 pm
Id.The government then re-indicted with four counts, including the "attempt count. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:40 pm
Those of us who represent directors and officers of failed banks are well aware that the FDIC is pursuing those individuals on the theory that they were grossly negligent in not anticipating the economic meltdown and in not building a banking business plan that could have withstood the fix we've been in these last few years, and the fix in which we're likely to wallow for at least a few years more (or, if we're unlucky, for a lot longer than that). [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
& perm. withdrawal of ref. req'd. in Bank Holding Co Trustee's suit ag FDIC re refunds under tax alloc. agr. http://ow.ly/59UO2 D-PA: BK Ct. rules state ct complaint ok against Trustee bec. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:40 pm
The FDIC has powers to dismantle the largest financial firms when they falter; the FDIC becomes a receiver for a bank if its failing presents a systemic risk to the financial markets. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:54 am
According to Mike Finn, the director for the OTS’s northeast region, the OTS’s authority to regulate holding companies was intended to ensure the safety and soundness of the FDIC-insured subsidiary of AIG and not to focus on the potential impact on AIG of an uninsured subsidiary like AIG Financial Products. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:29 am
And we have multiple regulators in the Fed, the OCC, the OTS, the FDIC. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:45 pm
There are many ways to incur the wrath of the FDIC if the bank fails. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:46 pm
And we entered a deflationary spiral… the same one we’re in today. [read post]
21 May 2011, 7:50 am
” Okay, so you get that far and you’re thinking: “Wow, cool. [read post]
15 May 2011, 7:52 pm
In addition, as the FDIC lawsuits against former directors of failed community banks continue to be filed, the pool of the most competent eligible directors will likely shrink. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
“players” that I’ve come to know over the last few years, there is no one that I have vacillated about more than FDIC Chair Sheila Bair. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:10 pm
The CRA only applies to specific lenders -- those that are depository institutions (banks) insured by the FDIC. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:22 am
If losses exceed that threshold, FDIC picks up 95%. [read post]
11 May 2011, 11:30 pm
Fast-forward again to January 16, 2009 and you find a joint press release from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, the FDIC, and the Treasury Department. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:47 pm
In other words, they're so stupid that they likely could not possess the mens rea sufficient to be found guilty of a crime.Thankfully, those type of clients are a distinct minority. [read post]
