Search for: "In Re: Lead Paint Litigation"
Results 281 - 300
of 304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
The comments section goes wild since the story doesn't say how far reclined the seat was, giving everyone a chance to spin the story any way they want;Moving on to the numerous recalls of painted children's toys that originated in China, the New York Times reports that lead was used because (surprise!) [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 4:02 pm
With the lead paint cases, Mattel isn’t going to have personal injury cases now. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Standard Brands Paint Co., 212 Cal. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 5:33 pm
., former Ku Klux Klansman James Seale in Mississippi and lead-paint makers in Rhode Island. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
"It's a wake-up call for American companies, regardless of where their products are coming from," said Beth Fegan, a partner in the Chicago office of Hagens Berman, which recently filed a proposed class action against the manufacturer of toys imported from China that allegedly contained lead paint. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 3:40 pm
The folks defending Merck are pretty smart, so we assume that argument is a loser in New Jersey.)Finally, on the same day that Judge Higbee was handing down her Vioxx decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided In re Lead Paint Litigation, __ A.2d __, 2007 WL 1721956 (N.J. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
This in turn would suggest that the dissenters in the ICJ were wrong to paint their supposed limitation of res judicata effect as a general principle, and conversely, that the majority of the Court did not so much extend the concept of res judicata, but only applied a broader notion that had existed previously.In English law, the leading case on the finality of judgments is Henderson v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
" In re Lead Paint Litigation "Plaintiffs cannot state a claim based on public nuisance against the manufacturers and distributors of lead paints. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:07 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled in In re: Lead Paint Litigation that local governments cannot sue paint manufacturers for creating a public nuisance where the only allegations are that the defendants made and lawfully sold a product and... [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:48 pm
On Friday, the New Jersey Supreme Court rejected a public nuisance claim against manufacturers of lead paint: In re Lead Paint Litig. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
The panel said that the loans through third parties for non-litigation-related expenses did not "directly" violate the Code of Professional Responsibility, but that James J. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:17 am
(Sorry - re-read that sentence slowly and it should all make sense. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
"But we know we're a David in a field of Goliaths. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
While public nuisance has very occasionally been alleged against drug manufacturers, it's reared its ugly head mostly against those products that a lot of people use (or used) even though we all know they're dangerous - guns, booze, lead-based paint, and cigarettes primarily. [read post]
2 May 2007, 12:57 am
"We're thinking this will be the first of many," said the head of the firm's Shanghai office. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:21 am
Vista et al. paint a broad new horizon over rough seas. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
She won't talk about cases that brought by private attorneys on behalf of the states, though there is interesting lead paint litigation in Ohio and Rhode Island. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
This week's New Jersey Legal Update podcast will discuss the case In re Lead Paint Litigation, which is currently before the New Jersey Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:05 pm
By Eric Goldman In re Miva, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
Many of the topics he deals with are way out of my depth, e.g., the question of and issues surrounding Rubens signing paintings done by his students (Rembrandt did this too, one gathers), or Shakespeare using prior work as the basis for some of his plays. [read post]
