Search for: "In Re Advertising & Marketing Development, Inc" Results 281 - 300 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Mandelman
At Time Inc. she was the assistant to the Chairman of the Board. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Thornburg, Trademark Surveys: Development of Computer-Based Survey Methods, 4 J. [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:06 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
If you found this article of interest, Solutions Law Press, Inc. invites you to check out other Solutions Law Press, Inc. publications. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:08 am
In re Paxil Litigation, 2002 WL 1940708 (C.D. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
 Marty Schwimmer didn’t; he reported on the first newsworthy development, the denial of a TRO to Charriol, way back in June of 2013. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 7:00 am by Race to the Bottom
(Id.).The SEC released this guidance in conjunction with a no-action letter requested by TurnKey Jet, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 10:47 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
I am not a big fan of measuring “content marketing” success by traffic. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Quirky Inc.: 70,000 users, 40% in the US. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 8:39 am by Vincent LoTempio
  The inventor/product developer has to wear many hats: manufacturer, marketer and distributor. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
  This can take a decade and hundreds of millions of dollars – and various stages of drug development clinical trials. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
  The legislature chose not to punish FDA-regulated activity, but the court nullified that legislative decision, with practically no discussion.In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Product Liability Litigation, 804 F.3d 633 (3d Cir. 2015). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:21 am by Kevin Goldberg
He starts off with a detailed description of FilmOn X’s technical system, noting that a number of the features which FilmOn X has touted in its own defense have not been shown to work as advertised; in some instances, they haven’t even been developed yet. [read post]