Search for: "In Re Austin W." Results 281 - 300 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onFederation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm by Jamison Koehler
For example, Jamie Spencer of Austin Criminal Defense and Brian Gurwitz of In Your Defense are both gone, presumably too caught up in thriving law practices to maintain their sites. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Adler jadler1969 Case Western Nadia Ahmad gatormob Pace Aziza Ahmed AzizaAhmed Northeastern Ifeoma  Ajunwa  iajunwa Univ District of Columbia Richard Albert richardalbert Boston College Ann Althouse annalthouse Wisconsin Diane Amann DianeMarieAmann Georgia Heidi Anderson HeidiRAnderson Florida Coastal Rachel Anderson salonsubrosa UNLV Michelle W. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:35 am by Charlotte Lawrence
President Joe Biden and Congress now face a decision about what to do with the 1033 program: should they re-reform it, or put a stop to transfers of military equipment to local police departments? [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 See White, 40 S.W. at 964 ("[W]hile a warranty may be looked to in order to determine whether the grantee may be an innocent purchaser or not, it is by no means conclusive. [read post]
The committee will hear testimony from Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III and Gen. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:55 am by Hunter Biederman
Jim McCormack PO Box 2505 Austin Texas 78768 United States --- Dear Fellow Attorneys: I normally do not get involved in things like this, but this time I feel I must. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
.: Burger chain’s public image didn’t justify ‘Fight for $15’ button ban The Fifth Circuit enforced an NLRB order finding that In-N-Out Burger violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA when it barred employees at an Austin, Texas, restaurant from wearing buttons supporting the “Fight for $15″ movement. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  First, “[w]hether the Federal Circuit improperly abrogated the plain meaning of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The intention of the Board is not to re-regulate the rail industry with burdensome new rules. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
CIVIL CONSPIRACY DOES NOT HAVE ITS OWN SOL -   TAKES IT FROM THE UNDERLYING TORT  The Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code (CPRC) specifies the limitations period for a number of different categories of claims, but civil conspiracy is not one of them. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
., 91 AD3d at 650B51; Matter of Tumari W., 65 AD3d at 1360) , because, in its  opinion, it conflicts with the plain meaning of the statute and is in contravention of its legislative history. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:51 pm by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Samuel Wooley, an assistant professor at the University of Texas Austin. [read post]