Search for: "In Re B" Results 281 - 300 of 26,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 12:54 pm by Abdo Law Firm
Isolated Incidents, Not Likely to Re-offend: There are many instances where we have advocated for ZERO probation, or for an abbreviated period of probation, on behalf of clients that are not likely to re-offend. [read post]
5 May 2010, 1:51 pm by rtruman
163 Years After Being Turned Down Because of His Race, Man Admitted to PA Bar :: In re George B. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 8:04 am by Jennifer Stephens
Overview of the new BloombergBNA unification at Dewey B Strategic: http://deweybstrategic.blogspot.com/2013/07/bloomberg-law-re-brands-learn-this_30.html [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:41 pm
Juvenile law Appellate Court slip opinion: In re Timothy B. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:56 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (4): In In Re: Indiana Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Indianapolis Star, Jeffrey M. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Marcia Oddi
Yesterday's COA decision in In In Re: Indiana Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Indianapolis Star, Jeffrey M. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:14 pm
Appellate Court Juvenile Law Slip Opinion: In re Niya B. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:11 pm
Citgo Petroleum Corp., 151 F.3d 402, 415 (5th Cir.1998) ("[M]onetary relief predominates in (b)(2) class actions unless it is incidental to requested injunctive or declaratory relief. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:34 am by John L. Welch
In the first, In re City of Houston, 101 USPQ2d 1534 (TTAB 2012) [precedential], District of Columbia, the Board affirmed a Section 2(b) refusal to register the official seal of the City of Houston for various municipal services. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 2:25 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The respondent had moved to Pakistan with B on 3 February 2014 without the appellant knowing or consenting to the move. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:41 pm
Back in 2007, Judge Ernest B. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:02 pm by Melinda Deel
You can view or download the case here: In re D.M. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:40 am
In In re: Castillo, the Bankruptcy Court for Central District of California held that "after making an 1111(b) election, an undersecured creditor may include in its 1111(b) secured claim post-petition attorneys' fees, but not post-petition interest." [read post]