Search for: "In Re Blake V."
Results 281 - 300
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2007, 7:53 am
E.g., Blakely v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:17 am
See Ivan V. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
As Lyle Denniston notes, now the earliest-argued case still undecided is "James v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Dept. of Child Services and Child Advocates (NFP) In Re: T.M.; Ray Lothamer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:43 am
We suggest all Judges and Prosecutors read Kyles v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 4:19 pm
Let the IPI know you're coming first, though. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:42 am
(Link to Cases): For publication opinions today (4): Ronald Lee Blake, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 10:42 am
Neither Jones, nor Apprendi, nor Ring, nor Blakely, nor Booker countenance this result. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 1:30 pm
Despite that decline, the number of criminal appeals in 2006 surpassed by more than 25% the number of filings in the years before the Court's decision in Blakely v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
State; Kolb v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
" Read more about the Burton appeal here in The National Appellate Journal, which writes that Burton asks: the Supreme Court the following questions: (1) Is the holding in Blakely v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
The Court of Appeals has decided another Blakely belated appeal: Baysinger v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
This case involves attempt to re-enter the U.S. case. [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 4:55 pm
The items don't disappear or get cleaned out just because they're "read. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 2:24 pm
(Merck KGaA v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
3 Mar 2005, 7:53 pm
March 3, 2005), and has now issued an "Amended Memorandum and Order Re: Sentencing Under United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2004, 9:47 am
Krebs v. [read post]
