Search for: "In Re Citibank" Results 281 - 300 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Jason Healey
  Though a trilemma is a tidy concept—things always seem better when they’re in threes—it is most likely that Maschmeyer is discussing a quadrilemma. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 9:15 am by Kristian Soltes
“To believe that Citibank, one of the most sophisticated financial institutions in the world, had made a mistake that had never happened before, to the tune of nearly $1 billion would have been borderline irrational,” wrote Furman, who presides in Manhattan. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by Mandelman
  I just learned that Citibank gets 25% of the trial payments if the loan ends up in foreclosure! [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
(Also, Third Circuit, we're capitalizing "Sister Circuits"?) [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:10 pm
We're still dancing," (he said in an interview with the FT in July 2007). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:34 am by Venkat
The court rejects this argument as well, citing to the statutory language and to In re Jiffy Lube. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jason M. Halper
The idea for a merger arose after Citibank bankers approached the CEOs of both companies to suggest a transaction. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:49 pm
Citi is one of the cleaner issuers, and they're not above a practice like this [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:35 am by Dan Lopez
Both companies refused, although if you can find in their letter where exactly they refused, you’re very good at reading purposely evasive text. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:07 pm by Mandelman
I personally think that they should have to wear matching sweaters if they’re going to vote in unison like that… if you’re going to vote like a glee club, you should have to dress the part. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Either: (a) massive litigations will not be pursued because they're too complicated, uncertain, protracted, and expensive; and/or (b) if they must be pursued, contract attorneys, staff attorneys, and outsourcers will provide the human throw-weight needed for massive document review; and/or (c) corporations will simply insist that document review be completed for flat fees of $X/unit [$1.00/page? [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Jordan Furlong
Every lawyer considers himself or herself to be an exceptional talent, and if there are some within the firm who make more money, well, that can be an accident of economics, and if there are some who are clearly incredibly gifted, well, we all like to have a few superstars on board; but let’s be perfectly clear, we’re all excellent around here — we’re only talking about degrees of excellence. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
They dictate the futures of eBay, Hewlett-Packard, Apple, Disney and these days Citibank, AIG and all the other wreckage piled up along the shore. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am by Mandelman
 An idea that’s supposed to stop people from walking away from underwater mortgages, brought to Wall Street by the guy who as a bond trader during the bubble cost Morgan Stanley $9 billion… this one you’re not going to believe. [read post]