Search for: "In Re Norris"
Results 281 - 300
of 332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2008, 5:09 am
” — Harold Feld “Seriously, this is approaching Chuck Norris-level aggrandizement. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Norris, 1 S. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
Don't forget that we always are looking to showcase noteworthy posts, so if you've got something you're proud of, send it to rob [at] lexblog [dot] com. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
The Watkins ruling was vacated by a larger panel of the 9th Circuit, which instead ruled in Watkins' favor using a non-constitutional theory of estoppel, reasoning that since the Army had allowed Watkins to re-enlist several times even though his homosexuality was known to them, it was precluded from rejecting his re-enlistment. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:16 am
Where it Crossed the Line: We’re thinking right about here: And by the end of 2000, it had international media attention–we’re talking mentions on Fox News, the BBC and articles in Time magazine. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 7:18 am
"We're working through a process, and I think it's the right process. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 4:55 am
Will skeptical reporters examine whether they're being treated fairly, under the rules, despite the snap judgments that the public and state authorities may find it easy to make? [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
Forest Laboratories, Inc. turns law of declaratory judgment on its head: (Patent Docs), (Patent Baristas), Mircera (Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) – Roche appeals preliminary injunction barring US sales of Mircera in patent infringement battle with Amgen: (Philip Brooks), (IP Law360), Norvasc (Amlodipine) – Ranbaxy becomes first foreign generic company to develop a generic product independently outside Japan and receive authorization from MHLW-Japan:… [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
the California Appellate Law Blog, managed and maintained by the Walnut Creek attorneys at Archer Norris. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:14 pm
The notice will be gone upon graduation, Avenir said.But the door is still open for the school to become involved with the conduct of students when they're online. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
Before we get started here, we have to point out that even though we’re smart and awesome and devastatingly attractive, we’re not lawyers. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 7:21 pm
The Antitrust Division has decided not to re-try Swanson. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:06 am
(citing In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Tires Products Liab. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:43 am
They're interesting and they sell newspapers, but they don't influence my vote. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
Robert Jarvik’s endorsement of Lipitor) to support for a political candidate (think Chuck Norris or Oprah Winfrey). [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:16 am
"If you feel a candidate is like you racially or by gender, you're more likely to believe that that candidate will support what you support," says [Harvard political scientist Pippa] Norris. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 10:03 am
"If you feel a candidate is like you racially or by gender, you're more likely to believe that that candidate will support what you support," says [Harvard political scientist Pippa] Norris. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's Stay Motion is in Re: Richard Allenv. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:56 am
Even excluding "Chuck Norris," you still get 1,833. [read post]
