Search for: "In Re Standing Order With Reasons Regarding Objections"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
Should he decide that he wants to rule on a particular question, his ruling stands as the judgment of the Senate (Rule 7) unless a senator seeks a vote on the question—“in which case it sh [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:20 pm
The court reasoned that such tailored relief would address LMFH's OCIs while also allowing TMA ample time to re-solicit the Task Order. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:26 am
With an appeal here and a possible answer someday from the 6th Circuit in Hadden, we're getting closer and closer to a Supreme Court resolution of this long standing nightmare. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
See point [4.2.1] of the Reasons. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
" That conclusion was based on the fact that MFS had failed to present evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find liability on the constitutional claims and also on the fact that "a reasonably objective regulator would not know that his conduct was unlawful. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 5:35 pm
Assistance in regard to the application of domestic law;l. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:22 am
As the SCOV notes up front, three facts combine in this case to make a rather thorny onion: 1) P.P. spent a short stint living with Father; 2) both parents think they’re owed back child support; and 3) when Father sought child support in Oklahoma neither he nor Mother lived in California, where the original divorce order was issued, or Georgia, where Mother domesticated the California order. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
How Courts Engage With Law: Theories of Judicial Interpretation --Yule Kim, “Statutory Interpretation; General Principles and Recent Trends,” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress Order Coder 97-589 (Aug. 31, 2008). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:38 am
That is an encouraging sign of the legalization of international norms within domestic orders (at least to the extent they are willing to apply them outside their own orders). [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
Family Court did so without conducting a hearing or taking evidence on the issues and erroneously relied upon hearsay statements made by DSS regarding a purported ICPC report. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
Family Court did so without conducting a hearing or taking evidence on the issues and erroneously relied upon hearsay statements made by DSS regarding a purported ICPC report. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
The approach in law is that set out by Lord Steyn in Re S and in respect of the requirement for ‘compelling reasons’ the judgment in A v Ward must be regarded as per incuriam and should not be followed. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 12:21 pm
” In re Ford Motor Co., 442 S.W.3d 265, 271 (Tex. 2014). [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
On the other hand, the hard places present their own challenges: (1) Russia re-emerging to embrace a role it had started placing well in the wake of the end of the Napoleonic Wars and takes up again, to replace the United States as the shadow under which Europe may be permitted to retain its wealth if not its power, and (2) China as a rising power, not yet militarily (though that is coming) but certainly in trade which poses the greatest threat to the core of the power of the… [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm
Civil procedure -- Summary judgment -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Standing -- Substituted plaintiff -- Trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of new plaintiff, to whom mortgage had been assigned, substituted for predecessor plaintiff on same day as hearing on motion for summary judgment, because the assignment from the predecessor plaintiff, which was not in the evidentiary record, leaves standing as an issue of material fact not conclusively established by the… [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:23 pm
In re Hannaford Bros. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
Upon joint motions regarding Defendant’s competency from Defendant’s counsel and the State, the trial court issued an order finding Defendant competent to stand trial on 23 October 2016. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:26 am
(C-623/17 [78], [80], [81]) - The objective of safeguarding national security is capable of justifying measures entailing more serious interferences with fundamental rights than might be justified by the other objectives set out in Article 15(1) of the ePrivacy Directive. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:01 pm
You can then re-offer any exhibit for which there is any question (and obtain a definitive ruling). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
In part, it reasoned that “a civilian spouse” should be entitled to recover the amount lost, regardless of earning capacity, other assets and obligations, remarriage, the former martial standard of living, or other 4320 factors. [read post]
