Search for: "In Re v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 17,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
Suppose you're a private-university president who wants to have affirmative action for faculty hiring or student admissions (or both). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:32 am
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUSINESS FEDERATION, CENTRAL VALLEY BUSINESS FEDERATION, and WESTERN GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by William Banks
Finally, Title 10 status occurs when state National Guard units are “federalized” by the president of the United States pursuant to one of the statutory authorities for doing so. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”) Florence Kelley didn’t think you had to squint to notice the enduringly unequal status of women in the United States in 1923. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner commenced the instant Article 78  proceeding to review the Executive Director's determination.* The Appellate Division, citing Ippolito v TJC Dev., LLC, 83 AD3d 57, ruled that the ALJ properly granted the Justice Center's motion to preclude Petitioner from relitigating the issues of whether she had a duty and breached her duty to provide adequate medical care to the Service Recipient as "The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner commenced the instant Article 78  proceeding to review the Executive Director's determination.* The Appellate Division, citing Ippolito v TJC Dev., LLC, 83 AD3d 57, ruled that the ALJ properly granted the Justice Center's motion to preclude Petitioner from relitigating the issues of whether she had a duty and breached her duty to provide adequate medical care to the Service Recipient as "The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]