Search for: "In re: Asbesto Products" Results 281 - 300 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am by Bexis
Oct. 20, 2009), which as we discussedat the time, adopted just about all the pro-preemption holdings in In re Medtronic Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability Litigation, 592 F. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
Macreath was represented at the Court of Session by Edinburgh law firm Simpson & Marwick, one of whose partners told MSPs at the Scottish Parliament HERE that ‘asbestos is good for you’. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  There were lots of different asbestos products, and the same kinds of asbestos products do (or, at least, plaintiffs allege they do) have similar risks. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm by Bexis
American Home Products Corp., 2005 WL 3766685, at *5 (Pa. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:44 am by Bexis
  The plaintiff claimed 37-year exposure to asbestos-containing products while working for the Illinois Central Railroad. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
[t]he reasoning in both the George and White cases is applicable”), aff’d, 44 F.3d 806 (9th Cir. 1995); In re TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 (2) Can documents shared among partners in a business negotiation be protected by the work product privilege? [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 8:03 am
If you're a smoker, you're at higher risks for developing asbestos-related diseases. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 9:38 am
He had alleged that he was exposed to asbestos fibers, dust and particles that were in products manufactured by John Crane Inc., as well as nearly two dozen other defendants. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
Into the 1970s and even the 1980s, it was a pretty widely used material that was used in a multitude of products and construction projects. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:09 am
We know that asbestos has been common in almost every older commercial structure, as well as many products. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
You Can’t Get There from HereWe’re somewhat less enamored with Romero v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:41 pm by Brad Pauley
  It held the defendant manufacturer owed the plaintiff no duty to warn about the dangers arising from asbestos-containing products used with its machines, and likewise owed no duty to prevent the resulting asbestos-related harm. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm by Bexis
The second case, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, 2012 U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:07 pm
In fact, the U.S. exported and re-exported nearly $30 million worth of asbestos in 2011. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:00 pm by William A. Ruskin
In the toxic tort context, across the Hudson River from New Jersey, New York litigants look to In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) Products Liability Litigation, 379 F. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:39 pm by David Oliver
If you're a maritime plaintiff and are unimpaired mere pleural thickening won't save your asbestos claim. [read post]