Search for: "In re: B. R." Results 281 - 300 of 12,103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 5:36 pm
Comm’r, which I summarily dismissed, I ignored habeas counsel’s shocking admission that he intentionally pled a meritless claim just to please his client. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Opinion No. 20190748-CA Filed December 24, 2020 Second District Court, Farmington Department The Honorable Michael Edwards No. 134701192 Jonathan Hibshman, Marco Brown, and Rodney R. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 7:40 am
Pour statuer sur cette requête, la Chambre examine d'abord si l'Opposante pouvait bénéficier de circonstances atténuantes quant à la fourniture tardive de D7. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Monroe Freedman
In connection with an article that we are exploring, Jennifer Gundlach and I are interested in hearing from lawyers, clinicians, and judges who might be aware of incidents in which either (a) a lawyer disclosed to a tribunal a client's perjury or intent to commit perjury, or (b) the lawyer did not disclose client perjury and the tribunal was made aware of it. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by A. Sasha Mandy
Soyez au rendez-vous pour cette opportunité de réseautage unique qui vise à réunir tous les acteurs du marché québécois des drones. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 1:18 pm
En particulier, le bénéficiaire doit tenir une comptabilité-matières et apposer une réserve d'emploi lors de toute remise en l'état de marchandises bénéficiant d'allégements douaniers sur le territoire douanier. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:17 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Lamaletie Anor v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 314 (28 February 2008) Lawlor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 474 (25 February 2008) Southwell, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 490 (25 February 2008) Taylor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 465 (22 February 2008) Jarvis, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 488 (22 February 2008) SD, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 527 (18 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tyco Fire & Integrated Solutions (UK) Ltd v… [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Cela s'applique a fortiori aux nouvelles requêtes déposées en octobre 2013 et aux arguments déposés en décembre 2013, quelques jours avant la procédure orale.Les nouvelles requêtes doivent donc être jaugées à l'aune de l'Art 13(1) et (3) RPCR ("modification des moyens invoqués").L'opinion annexée à la convocation à la procédure orale ne peut justifier l'admission de ces requêtes car… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:14 pm
OWNERSHIP EXPENSE NOT ALLOWED IF VEHICLE PAID FOR In re Howell, Case No. 06-11652 April 2007, Judge Nugent Trustee objected to 13 confirmation under 1325(b)(1)(B) on basis that debtors projected disposable income was too low because they were deducted an ownership expense on Line 28 of B22C even though vehicle was fully paid for and even though they [...] [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:35 pm by Michael Stevens
 Held real estate foreclosure action which sought to enforce a tax lien against B&P Apartments (B&P), was barred under the doctrine of res […] [read post]