Search for: "In re: Harper v. Harper"
Results 281 - 300
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
”We're waiting for appellate review on this issue. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
”We're waiting for appellate review on this issue. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Olsen Western District of Michigan at Marquette 08b0012p.06 2008/08/14 In re: Brice Road v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Harper ed. 1904) (tenfold penalty for stealing the goat of a freed man); Statute of Gloucester, 1278, 6 Edw. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 282:1374-6. 1982. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
It also means, however, that the AP sees the lead as the classic "heart of the work," (as in Harper & Row v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
Ct. 3000 (2007) (No. 06-415) (mootness due to respondents’ unilateral dismissal of complaint); Harper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Justice Stevens' lead opinion, to its credit, starts with the precedent most at risk in Crawford: the Court's 1966 opinion in Harper v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Harper v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 1:12 pm
That point is re-affirmed. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
Harper & Row shifted the test. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:31 am
June Besek: How should we be weighing predictability v. nuanced analysis? [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Peters, No. 05-6101 "A sentence imposed on remand for offenses arising out of a tax fraud scheme is reversed and remanded for re-sentencing where the district court's failure to address defendant's "time-served" argument did not satisfy the "procedural reasonableness" requirement required by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
Despite the loss, Kraft re-launched the suit later in the year. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
In short, we're thinking about "preemption lite. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
We need to take Martha Woodmansee's focus on authorial narratives very seriously.Tyler Ochoa, Santa Clara University School of Law, What if Goldstein v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 7:03 am
The Justices sent the case of Harper v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:32 pm
Repeat with me: the retail industry is competitive, faces low economic barriers to entry (spare me the Stigler v. [read post]
