Search for: "In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State" Results 281 - 300 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Abbott that states can draw legislative districts based on total population to mean that prisoners “can be counted in population totals for determining a voting district, even though they can’t cast ballots in the place where they’re being held” “shows how delicate the theory of virtual representation used in the Evenwel case really is. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 10:10 am by Florian Mueller
In December 2012, Apple informed the United States International Trade Commission of what it portrayed as a "remarkable about-face" by Samsung in the form of withdrawing injunction requests in Europe. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Instead, federal district courts are more likely to draw on the trade secret decisions of the states in which they sit, as occurs in typical Erie situations. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the California Court of Appeals – Fourth District:  People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeal – Fourth District:  In re M.H., 2016 WL 3541185 (2016). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They lost because the district judge determined that they had not sufficiently proven that the requirement would lead to substantially diminished abortion access. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK Ernesto Falcon of the Electronic Frontier Foundation argued that, in the wake of the D.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:14 pm by Dean Freeman
State of Florida, July 15, 2016, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal More Blog Entries: Grimes v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:22 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"Obviously, dangerous people need to stay locked up," state District Judge Susan Brown said at a news conference. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
App. 2010) (comment k “provide[s] a defense to a design defect claim”), rev’d on other grounds, 372 S.W.3d 140 (Tex. 2012); Schwarz v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am by MBettman
In Re CP, 2012-Ohio-1446,  (automatic mandatory lifelong sex-offender classifications for certain juvenile sex offenders violate due process.) [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 11:28 pm by Supreme People's Court Monitor
  as described in excerpts from this 2012 report by the US Administrative Conference by two professors, one from Harvard Law School and Vanderbilt University Law School (follow-up recommendations found here): A typical MOU assigns responsibility for specific tasks, establishes procedures, and binds the agencies to fulfill mutual commitments. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:00 pm
In 2012, Tennessee State Representative Richard Floyd, who introduced his very own anti-trans bathroom bill that year, described just what he’d do if he discovered a transgender woman in the same bathroom or dressing room as his wife or one of his daughters. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am by MBettman
In Re CP, 2012-Ohio-1446,  (automatic mandatory lifelong sex-offender classifications for certain juvenile sex offenders violate due process.) [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am by Chris Castle
The district court’s preliminary injunction is VACATED, and this case is remanded with instructions to DISMISS. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 3:15 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Closing Guantanamo is, if we're being totally honest, something much less than an imperative of any kind. [read post]