Search for: "In re Answers Corporation Shareholders Litigation"
Results 281 - 291
of 291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
The answer to the first question is "yes. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:12 pm
You're almost what we call appointing a litigation guardian, so to speak. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
The problems with this approach can be seen from the recent decision,In re InfoUSA Shareholders Litigation, Consol. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 1:27 am
Pillsbury Chairman Jim Rishwain says his firm found an answer. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 4:16 pm
That is not the end of the story for bankruptcy litigators, however, since Vice-Chancellor Strine's opinion in Trenwick America Litigation Trust v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:20 pm
My answer: It depends. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
Shareholders Litigation, [Current] Fed. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 1:05 am
Shareholders Stanley J. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:14 am
Securities Litigation. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:17 pm
Its solution is not to litigate but to seek the introduction of “a real system of shareholder rights” and to encourage “better dialogue between shareholders and companies” instead. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:52 pm
One of the aims of the Companies Act 2006 (or Company Law Reform Bill as it was known prior to enactment in November last year) was to clarify and simplify existing law, such as the Companies Act 1985, as amended, regarding the derivative claim and shareholder litigation. [read post]
