Search for: "In re Christopher R." Results 281 - 300 of 1,617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 11:24 am by Jason Smith
The Senate Law and Public Safety Committee advanced a Megan’s Law legislative initiative (S-205) introduced by Senator Christopher Connors, Assemblyman Brian Rumpf, and Assemblywoman DiAnne Gove to enhance the community notification process. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 11:29 am by Christine Corcos
Limited funding is available to assist scholars from the Global South with travel costs.Organizers: Joseph Slaughter (Columbia University), Vasuki Nesiah (New York University), Gerry Simpson (London School of Economics), Christopher Gevers (University of KwaZulu-Natal)Joseph R. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 11:29 am
Limited funding is available to assist scholars from the Global South with travel costs.Organizers: Joseph Slaughter (Columbia University), Vasuki Nesiah (New York University), Gerry Simpson (London School of Economics), Christopher Gevers (University of KwaZulu-Natal)Joseph R. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:49 am by Binxin Li
In response, LG Electronics initiated an invalidation action before the Patent Re-examination Board (PRB), challenging the validity of the ’855 Patent. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 3:21 am
Sadly, He’s Not Alone/Another wild week for the president, but does it lead to rejection or re-election? [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 6:42 am
Contents include:Conor O’Mahony, Constitutional Protection of Children’s Rights: Visibility, Agency and Enforceability Azadeh Dastyari & Asher Hirsch, The Ring of Steel: Extraterritorial Migration Controls in Indonesia and Libya and the Complicity of Australia and Italy Ben T C Warwick, Unwinding Retrogression: Examining the Practice of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Gilles Giacca & Ellen Nohle, Positive Obligations of the Occupying Power: Economic, Social… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:59 am by Francois Pochart
It is only known that the examiner who assessed the patent application would not be a member (Article R. 613-44-11), whereas the EPO allows it. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
MSN – Reis Thebault (Washington Post) | Published: 11/12/2019 A fabricated Time cover is just one of Mina Chang’s listed accomplishments and résumé line items that has come into question after a media investigation found the Trump administration appointee embellished her work history and made misleading claims about her professional background. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:13 am
Anand in the Postcolony: Between Resistance and AppropriationCarl Landauer, Taslim Olawale Elias: From British Colonial Law to Modern International LawUmut Özsu, Determining New Selves: Mohammed Bedjaoui on Algeria, Western Sahara, and Post-Classical International Law Emamanuelle Tourme Jouannet, Charles Chaumont's Third World International Legal Theory Christopher Gevers, Literal 'Decolonisation': Re-reading African International Legal Scholarship through the… [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am by Arnie Clarke
After visiting Cranfield University in July 1982, Prof Shanks became interested in the possibility of using re-usable or disposable devices incorporating biosensors for diagnostic applications. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Jan von Hein
Christoph Thole analyses the judgment and its consequences for other damage claims based on German law. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:03 am by Thorsten Bausch
With my limited economic understanding, I just wonder one thing: If EPO management seriously believes in any of the more gloomy-gap predictions and thinks it is appropriate to invest a large proportion of both its investment fund and its pension fund on the stock market, would it not be wise to shorten the stocks now, thus generating a buffer, and re-invest after the slump? [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 6:36 am by John Coley (UK) and Lisa Lee Lewis (UK)
On 21 October 2019, the FCA published a speech by Christopher Woolard (Director of Strategy and Competition at the FCA) entitled Regulation in a changing world. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:03 am by Selin Sinem Erciyas
Finally, as the legal provision (the so-called Bolar exemption) already determines that a pending MA application is exempted from patent rights and therefore does not constitute patent infringement, it is unnecessary for the IP Court to re-evaluate if such an act constitutes infringement or not. [read post]