Search for: "In re Clinton S."
Results 281 - 300
of 5,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2008, 7:40 pm
She won over skeptical voters and then delivered on her promises and handily won re-election in 2006. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:55 pm
But it's time for them to bow out, in recognition of the inevitable: Senatrix Hillary Rodham Clinton is UNSTOPPABLE! [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
But when Julian Assange failed to release anything new, the individual who refers to himself as Guccifer 2.0 posted what he claimed were files from the Clinton Foundation's servers. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
In sum, there's a strong argument that's there is no emoluments problem -- the emoluments at issue here were increased in 1990, long before Clinton's term. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
That process is ongoing.SECRETARY CLINTON: And there’s no pre-selection? [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 5:12 am
They're not analyzing ads. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:49 am
Clinton’s continued involvement as a “crusading diplomat on the world stage. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 5:24 pm
I don't think that's gonna hold up.... [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Clinton’s interests by a party that is mostly in her pocket. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
As an experienced lawyer Hillary Clinton surely knows better than to say the things she’s saying about gun lawsuits. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 11:29 am
As this article in today's New York Times explains, it comes down to microtargeting:If there's butter and white wine in your refrigerator and Fig Newtons in the cookie jar, you're likely to vote for Hillary Clinton. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
SJ’s. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:45 am
Really, You’re Blaming Transgender People for Trump? [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:01 pm
Well, if you're her, it's almost the ultimate--and you'd be celebrating, duck-walking, and doing the antler dance. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 4:32 pm
YET ANOTHER DUMB INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWSUIT: "The company that licensed the US rights to Orwell's 1984 don't really understand copyright, so they're threatening the people who made the now-infamous Hillary Clinton/Apple 1984-ad mashup. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 4:48 pm
Ramirez v Clinton D. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:43 am
I agree with Mickey: "Could the piece have been as bad for the Clinton camp as the publicity they're now getting? [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
The campaign's just not catching on. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
Let's revote, and let's see how we do. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 3:28 am
The Supreme Court's decision to re-hear oral argument has prompted the filing of more than 40 "amicus" briefs from such disparate groups as the NRA and the ACLU. [read post]
