Search for: "In re Dominic F." Results 281 - 300 of 652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2018, 11:58 am by David M. Ward
An effective strategy here is to target specific segments of the bigger market (niche markets) and dominate those niches. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
In other words, we’re not hiding anything, but, actually, we kind of are. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:11 pm
  To that extent, at least, there is little point (except narcissism and politics) to waste a lot of time berating or belittling this or that in the approach or in the perspective f the President. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
[I]f you’re not challenging their decision not to institute review, why would that make any difference? [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:48 am
(I once wrote a little about this in “The Führer Principle of International Law: Individual Responsibility and Collective Punishment,” Penn State International Law Review 21(3): 509-567 (2003)).In a sense, then, the periodic exiting and re-entry of states within international organizations and in international treaties or conventions reflect conventional moves in the governance of those systems and in the constant negotiating that marks the dynamic development of… [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am by Michael J. Glennon
PDF version A review of Oona A. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Co., 213 USPQ 594 (TTAB 1982), aff’d, 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ 505 (Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 6:33 pm by Jarod Bona
Bona Law filed an antitrust lawsuit on behalf of our client in the Northern District of Georgia alleging antitrust violations in the cement and ready mix concrete markets. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) Several months ago I posted a draft syllabus for a new course on Corporate Social Responsibility (Corporate Social Responsibility Law--A Tentative Syllabus). [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION  STEPHEN A. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
Equustek claimed that for many years Datalink had been re-labelling one of Equustek’s products and passing it off as Datalink’s own; that Datalink then acquired confidential information and misused it to design and manufacture a competing product; and that Datalink then passed off the competing product by supplying it in substitution for Equustek products advertised on its websites. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
Equustek claimed that for many years Datalink had been re-labelling one of Equustek's products and passing it off as Datalink's own; that Datalink then acquired confidential information and misused it to design and manufacture a competing product; and that Datalink then passed off the competing product by supplying it in substitution for Equustek products advertised on its websites. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
Equustek claimed that for many years Datalink had been re-labelling one of Equustek's products and passing it off as Datalink's own; that Datalink then acquired confidential information and misused it to design and manufacture a competing product; and that Datalink then passed off the competing product by supplying it in substitution for Equustek products advertised on its websites. [read post]