Search for: "In re Grand Jury Proceedings"
Results 281 - 300
of 752
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
The first is a subpoena from Mueller for Trump to testify before a grand jury. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:45 am
You're the Chairman of the Committee; get the damned documents, and make sure you know what the hell you're talking about. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:37 pm
Criminal investigations take place in a complex interaction between the Justice Department and grand juries, which are instrumentalities of the judiciary, and they end up in court [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:48 am
” Yes, it is very bad for all those who may have colluded with the Russians to get Trump elected President of the United States for ulterior criminal motives, and for all those who have lied to the FBI, the Special Counsel’s Office, the grand jury, or congressional committees during the Trump/Putin-related investigations. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit in In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena (U.S. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
But for warrantless surveillance orders, the cases are marked as Grand Jury (GJ) proceedings. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
With those affirmations, the argument proceeded on other matters. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Each written credit service agreement contained a provision entitled "Waiver of Jury Trial and Arbitration Provision" (hereinafter referred to as "arbitration provision"). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:02 am
by Carl Malamud When Peter Martin and Tom Bruce decided 25 years ago to serve the law on the Internet, they were joining a grand tradition of promulgation dating back 25 centuries. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 9:35 am
Despite its broad power to institute criminal proceedings, the grand jury grew in popular favor with the years. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
“It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr memo concluded. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
Impeachment—from the Latin impedicāre, to fetter, to entangle—is a process that the Framers did not merely export from the Brits but rescued from a withering vine. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:10 pm
But as we pointed out, that’s inconsistent with case law that says, for instance, that witnesses at grand jury proceedings—which are historically both secret and subject to court oversight—cannot be indefinitely gagged from talking about their own testimony. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:46 pm
Don’t read us because you’re a criminal. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:02 am
In New Jersey, a grand jury indicted Burr on a murder charge in November 1804. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
’Thus, the Ohio Constitution guarantees that the essential facts constituting the offense for which an accused is tried will be found in the grand jury indictment. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:40 pm
S. 683, 702 (1974) (pretrial subpoenas duces tecum); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 696 F. 3d 428, 432 (CA5 2012) (grand jury subpoenas); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 616 F. 3d 1186, 1201 (CA10 2010) (same). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
There was clearly a proceeding underway, and clearly the defendant knew about that proceeding. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Dec. 15, 2011); In re Frito-Lay N. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
Dec. 15, 2011); In re Frito-Lay N. [read post]
