Search for: "In re Jonathan H."
Results 281 - 300
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2017, 5:50 am
And they’re not. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:45 am
No executive order can re-establish a constitutional right. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 7:34 am
Make no mistake about it, I am deeply disappointed that President Trump and Vice President Pence were not re-elected. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:52 am
So while federal courts can sometimes enjoin unconstitutional state laws, we can't engage in "a plenary re-writing of the State's ballot-access provisions. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:53 am
In other words, if you're having a hard time finding infant formula, you can thank Uncle Sam. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:10 pm
Judge Wiener's relatively brief opinion begins: On January 20, 2021, the Biden Administration issued an executive order that re-established an interagency working group ("Working Group") to formulate guidance on the "social cost of greenhouse gases. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm
From Kagan's opinion: Some years ago, I remarked that "[w]e're all textualists now. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:59 am
Somehow we're supposed to believe that Domenech's lone tweet is a more serious concern? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
Could Kamala Harris resolve a dispute over competing electoral vote slates in the 2024 presidential election, perhaps choosing the slate supporting her own re-election as vice president? [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm
The PPACA was bad enough as drafted, but what we’re getting is something else entirely. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:59 am
His op-ed begins: When college students who sympathize with Palestinians chant "From the river to the sea," do they know what they're talking about? [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:32 pm
The primary battle arose from Posner’s demand that he be allowed to re-write all his circuit’s staff attorneys’ memos and draft opinions before they went to his fellow judges. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:17 am
Tr. 10:16–11:1 (Association counsel answering "probably, yes" when asked if the EPA could "pass a regulation that says tractors are banned * * * from traveling on roads and highways if they're pulling loads that cause the tractor's emissions to increase by XX amount"). [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Cannon, Jonathan. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:09 pm
It’s not turgid like those H-Germans, Habermas or Heidegger. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:12 am
Cir. 2007), citing H. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm
It is as if the agency action had never occurred, with the caveat that agencies are not allowed to re-issue the disapproved rule or its equivalent. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 1:28 pm
They couldn’t imagine what returns we would generate over the long term…” [h/t Darlene Fichter] [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Miscellany - Frank H. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
The reason there will be no more than 58 opinions in argued cases is because one of those cases (In re Grand Jury) was DIGed (dismissed as improvidently granted), and SEC v. [read post]
