Search for: "In re Marks" Results 281 - 300 of 29,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 12:05 am by Afro Leo
Word from Aminou Ndala TITA, media and IP Officer for non profit organisation Taking IT Global reports from Cameroon that the Trademark Office in Libya officially re-opens nearly two years after its services were interrupted as a result of the latest civil unrest in the country. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:00 am
("Stitch") to register STITCH as a trade mark for various services [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:00 am
In re Frito-Lay North America, Inc., Serial No. 78555200 (May 2, 2008) [not precedential].In the Final Refusal, the Examining Attorney made the strange argument that the fact that Frito-Lay had registered the mark in the design form shown below (with the same specimen of use) was evidence that "applicant recognizes this application contains two separate marks. [read post]
28 May 2021, 3:39 am
In re Epic Games, Inc., Serial No. 88233723 (May 26, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:58 am by paperstreet
“We hold that such re-registration is not a ‘registration’ within the meaning of § 1125(d)(1). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
’” In re Fat Boys Water Sports LLC, 118 U.S.P.Q.2d 1511, 1515-16 (T.T.A.B. 2016) (quoting In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP, 373 F.3d 1171, 71 U.S.P.Q.2d 1370, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
HP, Hurd, Deloitte and Tone at the Top by Francine McKenna in re: The Auditors What do HP, Boeing and Navistar have in common? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:31 pm
California - In In re BP Lubricants USA Inc., the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that a false marking claim must satisfy the particularity standard of Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), which requires that complaints alleging fraud or mistake "state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:57 am
Bush hosted a ceremony marking the National Day of Prayer. [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:32 am by By Erik Lundegaard
We're pleased to announce that "The Green River Killer's Lawyer," a profile of Mark Prothero, a criminal defense attorney with Hanis Irvine Prothero in Kent, Wash., which appeared in the July 2010 issue of Washington Super Lawyers magazine, was honored last weekend in the Excellence in Journalism Contest sponsored by the Northwest chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
Pondering the propriety of Applicant wTe Corporation's drawings and specimens, the Board rendered a split decision in In re wTe Corp., Serial Nos. 78227268 and 78227272 (May 13, 2008) [precedential]. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In fact, the CCA had re-affirmed the use of bite-mark evidence as recently as 2012. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 8:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In the FUCT case (In re Brunetti), the Federal Circuit mooted the Lanham Act’s prohibition against registering immoral or scandalous marks — holding the limitation to be an unconstitutional restriction of free speech and reversing the TTAB holding that Bruneti’s “FUCT” mark is unregistrable. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:39 pm by Glo
Typically, we’re not huge fans of the workers’ comp system around here, but again, it seems as if this is the only thing here that’s going to be of any help. [read post]