Search for: "In re Wal*Mart Stores, Inc." Results 281 - 300 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:43 pm by Steven G. Pearl
On that basis, plaintiffs were paid a single seventh day premium at the end of the second workweek.Slip op. at 3, citing In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am by JakeMcGowan
Brian Masck’s Claims Against the Plethora of Defendants Brian Masck is suing Sports Illustrated, Nissan, Getty Images, Champions Press, Photo File, Inc., Fathead, Wal-Mart, Amazon.com, and Desmond Howard himself. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by Wes Anderson
But Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has styled the website as something else – infringement upon its WALMART trademark. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am by Matt C. Bailey
LEXIS 86769, at 26-28.In certifying the subclass, the Court rejected the defendant’s argument that the Supreme Court’s decision Wal-Mart precluded a finding of commonality based solely on the testimony of the discrict managers alleged de facto policy: The Court also rejects defendants' argument that the recent Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm by John Elwood
From affirmative action, we’re grateful to move to a much less controversial issue: abortion. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm by Charles Casper
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm by Charles Casper
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bone/Wal-Mart on error costs: source identification is expensive to determine, which I think the paper is clear about in struggling w/solutions. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas)… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 1006:Under the Elections Code, a city council facing a qualifying citizen sponsored land use initiative measure is precluded from direct adoption of the measure without first complying with CEQA. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:42 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
” One judge on the panel deciding the appeal filed a lengthy dissent, equating the independent distributors with long-haul drivers carrying goods for Wal-Mart because the contracts in question are called “Distributor Agreements. [read post]