Search for: "In re the Interest of J. R."
Results 281 - 300
of 2,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
This is in part because I find tax law and economic policy interesting and important on their own merits, but it is also in part because con law is a field in which many of the discussions have devolved into focusing on minutiae that I find uninteresting—or are simply so far off the rails that scholarly interventions seem useless.For example, the state of constitutional doctrine regarding the Commerce Clause is so corrupted by this point that even the best scholarship must take as a… [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
I have not checked, but I have no reason to doubt that other major news sources went through the same motions, writing predictably misleading articles in response to the release of the Social Security Trustees’ 2021 annual report.The two-step occasioned by these annual exercises in stoking panic among the public is always the same: The Trustees issue an extensive statistical analysis and 75-year forecast of the finances of Social Security and Medicare, which includes an ominous summary written… [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
See also Richard J. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:30 am
Néanmoins, la notion d’accèselle-même invite à réfléchir à ses contours, en ce compris sur le plan éthique : la volonté d’ouvrir l’accès de manière universelle à certains contenus culturels dématérialisés peut se heurter à certains droits et intérêts, notamment ceux des communautés d’origine, a fortiori lorsqu’i [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:30 am
Néanmoins, la notion d’accèselle-même invite à réfléchir à ses contours, en ce compris sur le plan éthique : la volonté d’ouvrir l’accès de manière universelle à certains contenus culturels dématérialisés peut se heurter à certains droits et intérêts, notamment ceux des communautés d’origine, a fortiori lorsqu’i [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
The clear answer is no, but the reasons are interesting, as is the reason even to ask the question in the first place.The U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 7:49 am
" This was well before 9/11, but already, when they were back after eight years of the [William J.] [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 2:59 pm
J. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:39 pm
Jones, Harold Brown Chair and director of the International Security Program, Michael J. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 10:18 pm
In re Murchison, 349 U. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:00 am
Profits of U.S. multinationals booked in their controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) could be included in the parent companies’ taxable income through two methods: passive CFC profits—such as interest and royalty income—were automatically included in their parent companies’ taxable income via subpart F rules, but active CFC profits were only subject to tax when repatriated to the parent as a dividend. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Empirical research showed reduced R&D spending following the FTDA. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
(R. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) : Le juge de première instance a commis une erreur révisable en décidant que la peine totale qu’il imposait à l’intimé devait être purgée concurremment, plutôt que consécutivement, à celle déjà imposée par un autre juge, dans un autre dossier et en lien avec des infractions distinctes. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
President Joseph R. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
If, for example, the federal government were to take in three trillion dollars while it is legally committed to spending four trillion dollars, the one-trillion-dollar difference would be financed by borrowing on the open financial markets.But what if Congress says to the President: “We know you cannot do what you’re legally required to do without borrowing the necessary trillion dollars, but even so, we’re not going to update the debt ceiling statute to allow you… [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
Justices Middleton, Jagot and Moshinsky identified three errors of principle in Justice Perram’s evaluation of ‘strong reasons’, enabling them to re-evaluate whether strong reasons existed. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:46 pm
" The plaintiff asserts that neither he, nor Donald J. [read post]
