Search for: "In re. A. C." Results 281 - 300 of 28,710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am by Virginia Canter
Sun-Diamond Growers, a case with facts eerily reminiscent of those uncovered in recent Supreme Court ethics scandals, the justices significantly limited the reach of another public corruption law, the illegal gratuities statute, 18 USC § 201(c), in similar fashion. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:30 am by sinclair
But when you’re advertising for your law firm, there are several regulations you’ll need to follow. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
A fascinating legal soap opera is now underway following a trial just completed in California. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm by Russell Knight
The projected value of the husband’s carry is then multiplied by C to give the marital carry. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
” In re Lowry, 138 N.Y.S.3d at 241-2. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Silver Law Group
Sometimes brokers push variable annuities on their clients even when they’re not suitable. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
”] In re Premium Economy Concepts LLC, Serial No. 90014041 (April 5, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher C. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:12 pm by Berry Law
Attend Compensation and Pension (C&P) Exam: You may be scheduled for a medical examination to assess the severity of your neck pain. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]