Search for: "In the Interest of: R.C."
Results 281 - 300
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
Key Statute and Precedent R.C. 2745.01 – Liability of employer for intentional tort – intent to injure required – exceptions. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
While Hoyle and the employers filed separate briefs, and have antagonistic positions in the event of trial on the merits, their interests are aligned for the purposes of this appeal. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:48 am
Ultimately, the court determined the trial court’s narrowly tailored order adequately limits use of the record to the retaliation case, which balances the interests of the State and Vanzandt. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
It was interesting how much of her take-charge mark the Chief has made—the Court at times seemed listless and rudderless. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:30 am
” Kennedy accuses the majority of ignoring this express statutory provision in the construction statute of repose (which Hallmark conceded at argument does not apply to this case, but Kennedy does not mention that specifically) and for ignoring the express legislative intent to “promote a greater interest than the interest underlying the general four-year statute of limitations” of R.C. 2305.09. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:16 am
” Justice Pfeifer dissented on the ground that the Court never should have accepted this case, which is of no public or general interest. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
” See, R.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:23 am
… Legislative measures proposing to amend R.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 12:37 pm
There’s been a lot of interest on the blog in the Prade case, in which former Akron police captain Douglas Prade was found guilty of the 1997 aggravated murder of his ex-wife Dr. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 11:21 am
” Case Syllabus Unvested military retirement benefits earned during marriage fall within the definition of marital property in R.C. 3105.171(A)(3)(a) and must be considered for division under R.C. 3105.171(C). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
While it is true that the language of R.C. 5321.04(A) is specific enough to impose negligence per se, the definition of “tort action” in R.C. 2315.21(A)(1) specifically excludes damages for breach of contract or another agreement between persons. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
The two key statutory provisions that allow a court to consider youth a factor in sentencing are R.C. 2929.11 and R.C. 29292.12. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 2:52 pm
R.C. 2905.05(A) is such a statute…. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 pm
The popularity of “Deal of the Day” websites, such as Groupon and LivingSocial, has created an interesting issue as to the correct sales tax base when redeeming vouchers purchased from such websites, as illustrated in a previous post. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:17 am
(Insurer’s tortious litigation conduct imputed to its insured for purposes of prejudgment interest award to plaintiff.) [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:49 pm
I would further conclude that R.C. 2923.16(B) is narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and that it adequately leaves open alternative means for an individual to assert his or her Second Amendment right to bear arms. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:06 am
What does the statute (R.C. 4735) call the relationship? [read post]
Oral Argument Preview: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
30 Dec 2013, 7:03 am
Furthermore, the Kuchtas argue that no one has a vested right or interest in a judgment that is void so there can be no public policy consideration that affords finality to an interest that does not exist. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am
The parties have two children, R.C., born on August 3, 1994, and S.C., born on 14 February 1998. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:20 am
“The tribunal’s decision provides for two possible courses of action and our trustees will collaborate with each other, engage with parents, and consider the best interests of the students we serve to determine the best way to move forward. [read post]
