Search for: "In the Matter of John C. Johnson" Results 281 - 300 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
In our recent case of Edward Charles Washington and Travis Parker versus Aetna Life Insurance d/b/a One Canal Place, Schindler Elevator Corporation, Corporate Realty Advisors, and Zurich Insurance Company, Docket Number 01-9541-C of the Civil District Court of the City of New Orleans, all of the issues with respect to the potential modification of the video tape surveillance evidence was presented to us for defending. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
(c) Greatest Super Bowl ever. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 10:55 am
But so little is written about it except with regard to national security matters that our law school was unable to put together a conference dealing with its vast but unacknowledged breadth and consequences. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
[OH-10] - 7/30/2007 Rep LaTourette, Steven C. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[OH-10] - 7/30/2007 Rep LaTourette, Steven C. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 2:02 pm
Charles Perez Bankruptcy Canada Blog bob tarantino Cavanagh Williams C'est é-patent! [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:12 am
Judge Johnson also gave John Doe's attorney, Chad Montgomery of the Earl McCoy Law Firm in Lafayette, 10 days to respond to the defense motion. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Underlying the policy is a recognition that it is not fair that an individual should be subject indefinitely to the threat of being sued over a particular matter. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:54 am
14 (ii) Except as otherwise provided by law, on the first day of April in 15 each year commencing on or after two thousand eight, if the annual sala- 16 ry of a judge of the United States district court was increased within 17 the preceding twelve months, the annual salary of a justice of the EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. [read post]