Search for: "Irish v. Irish" Results 281 - 300 of 1,633
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2008, 11:59 pm
Having already dealt with one situation earlier in the decade (VGT v Switzerland, 2001), finding that a Swiss ban was a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression), and returned to a related matter in the Murphy v Ireland case mentioned on these pages last week, upholding an Irish ban on religious advertising, the case decided today involved a Norwegian political party’s attempt to advertise on TV, despite a statutory ban on such advertisements. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:08 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down a neat judgment in Case C-209/07 Competition Authority v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:38 am by Máiréad Enright
Related PostsJuly 12, 2010 -- Calt on A, B & C v Ireland (1)December 9, 2009 -- A, B and C v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Procter & Gamble v HMRC [2008] EWHC 1558 (Ch) (Warren J) (Thanks to the Legal Post for highlighting this case). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:33 pm by Barry Barnett
Take the case of Global Seafood Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by GuestPost
Related PostsJanuary 10, 2011 -- Irish Women Politicians and Abortion: Hope for change after the ECHR ruling (0)December 15, 2010 -- In advance of A, B & C v Ireland: A Primer on the ECtHR (0) [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by GuestPost
Read more>> Related PostsDecember 1, 2009 -- A, B and C v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:00 am by GuestPost
 Conclusion In light of this ruling, it is clear that Irish abortion law ‘waters’ have not broken. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:24 am
Someone bought the Millen garments from one of its Irish outlets, following which Dunnes made copies which it sold in Ireland in 2006 under its "Savida" label. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 3:48 am
The case is C-127/08 Metock and Others v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and the judgment was handed down on July 25th 2008. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm by Michel-Adrien
The concept refers to investment by non-parties in dispute resolution.From the executive summary: "In Persona Digital Telephony Ltd v Minister for Public Enterprise, the Supreme Court confirmed that the torts and offences of maintenance and champerty remain part of Irish law. [read post]