Search for: "J. S. McCain" Results 281 - 300 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
We have heard for years that Republicans are afraid of Trump’s tweets, of Trump’s willingness to abuse the powers of the presidency, and of Trump’s supporters. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:34 am by Richard Painter
  Some soldiers came back from Vietnam unharmed, others like Senators Chuck Hagel and John McCain were badly wounded, and tens of thousands never came home. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
But he’s in our system where he does not exist alone. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:22 pm by LindaMBeale
  Skousen "was considered so radical in the early nineteen-sixteies that even J. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  Moreover, in addition to unanimous Democratic support, the bill also garnered the support of ten Republican senators, including John McCain and Orrin Hatch. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am by Robert Chesney
” Simply put: Section 130(j) speeds up the reporting process for the subset of cyber ops that the Pentagon conducts that are meant to have third-country (out-of-theater) effects. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:59 am by FDABlog HPM
Senate passed S. 3187, the FDA Safety and Innovation Act, on Thursday afternoon by a roll call vote of 96-1. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
  President Donald J. [read post]