Search for: "J. S. Willis"
Results 281 - 300
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
J. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:05 am
See William J. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 3:15 am
Willis, 257 F.3d 636, 643 (6th Cir.2001); and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:56 am
Originators feel that their protection remains inadequate in relation to the expense and risk of developing new products; competitors feel cheated by monopolies that stretch out beyond the natural life of the patent and consumers consider that long-term protection forces prices up.What SPC really stands for .... hereFor real enthusiasts of Supplementary Protection Certificates, here's The SPC Blog [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:22 am
District Judge, District 219 • Scott J. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
I am pleased to publish below an article by my good friend Richard J. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
BAILEY, J., concurs. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:51 am
Matt Willie. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm
Apr. 30, 2012) (Straniere, J.). [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:00 am
Pablo y J. [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:00 am
Pablo y J. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 3:38 am
Photo on lower right by Etan J. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:09 pm
For example, in 1847, showing a healthy suspicion for principles developed in the ecclesiastical courts and the Star Chamber, Australians came up with the defence of triviality, a defence drawn from Australia’s convict past, where nobody had much of a reputation – or, as Rich J more diplomatically put it, “to meet the hard conditions of pioneer days” (Lang v Willis (1934) 52 CLR 637 at 650). [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
Willis, 523 F.3d 762, 766 (7th Cir. 2008). [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 5:10 am
Many thousands of women are expected to converge on the nation’s capital for the Women’s March on Washington the day after Donald J. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:39 am
Junker and J. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 3:41 am
—S & J. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 7:57 am
Pluto from Tina Willis of Tina Willis Law. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
Indeed, he merely restated what historian David J. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
`Faced with the habeas court's denial of certification to appeal, a petitioner's first burden is to demonstrate that the habeas court's ruling constituted an abuse of discretion. . . . [read post]