Search for: "JOEL TENENBAUM"
Results 281 - 300
of 317
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
Cloherty of Dwyer & Collora.Amicus curiae CVN was represented by Jonathan Sherman of Boies, Schiller & Flexner.Joel Tenenbaum was represented by Prof. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:12 pm
Courtesy of Hit & Run, I see that Nesson is indulging that flair in his defense of RIAA defendant Joel Tenenbaum. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:12 am
The underlying case pits the RIAA against a Boston University graduate student named Joel Tenenbaum over allegations of illegal file-sharing. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 11:26 am
Joel Tenenbaum (et 100+) mess. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Tenenbaum, on the subject of whether a lower court oral argument can be broadcast, will take place on Wednesday, April 8th, at 9:00 A.M., at the federal courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts.Update 4/9/9: "MP3 File of First Circuit oral argument in SONY v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 5:21 am
Tenenbaum litigation team.This question, and the extremely disappointing answers it elicited, jumped out at me:p2pnet: Will you be taking on other cases? [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:16 pm
Tenenbaum, the First Circuit's oral argument -- concerning whether an argument in the court below can be made available online -- will itself be available online, according to a March 10, 2009, order rescheduling the appeals court argument for April 8th at 9 A.M.I.e. the argument, about whether to stream the lower court argument, will itself be streamed.Additionally, the defendant Joel Tenenbaum has filed a supplemental brief arguing that the 1996 Judicial Council… [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 7:34 am
Here's the summary of the podcast, which is part of Doug's ongoing IP Colloquium series: Joel Tenenbaum looks a lot like every other defendant who has been accused by the music industry of illegally sharing copyrighted work online, but with one key difference: his defense attorney is Harvard Law School Professor Charlie Nesson, and Nesson is out to turn his case into a public referendum not only on the music industry's efforts to enforce… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(Ars Technica) RIAA – Shahanda Moursy sues RIAA for fraud, abuse and legal sham (TorrentFreak) Tenenbaum, Joel – Defence team’s unorthodox tactics in illegal file-swapping case incurs judge’s displeasure (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court New Hampshire: Domaining registrar defeats cybersquatting lawsuit: Philbrick v eNom, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) District… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:39 pm
There's an interesting new podcast up on Intellectual Property Colloquium, and it includes a terrific lineup of guests: Joel Tenenbaum looks a lot like every other defendant who has been accused by the music industry of illegally sharing copyrighted work online, but with one key difference: his defense attorney is Harvard Law School Professor Charlie Nesson, and Nesson is out to turn his case into a public referendum not only on the music industry's efforts to enforce… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
Over at Doug Lichtman’s IP Colloquium, there is a new (and what looks to be very interesting) program up on the Tenenbaum file-sharing litigation. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:24 am
The pretrial hearing concerns Boston University student Joel Tenenbaum whose attorney, Harvard University professor Charles Nesson, is challenging the lawsuit and the constitutionality of the Copyright Act, which allows penalties of up to $150,000 per infringed music track. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:45 am
;-the pending discovery motions will all be decided upon the papers, without oral argument;-initial disclosures and expert disclosures are due March 30, 2009;-each party may take up to 5 additional depositions, not counting expert depositions, but no party may be deposed who has previously been deposed except with the permission of the Court; -all discovery must be completed by May 30, 2009; and-if the unconstitutionality dismissal motion is denied, the parties should expect to go to trial by the… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 1:49 am
The students would quickly mount an ambitious defense, not just of Joel Tenenbaum, but of the claim that the RIAA legal campaign was unconstitutionally excessive and improper. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 4:31 pm
Thanks to Ben Sheffner for making these briefs available.The brief filed by Joel Tenenbaum, and the amicus curiae brief of CVN, filed in opposition to the RIAA's petition for 'mandamus or prohibition' in SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:30 am
The defendant, Joel Tenenbaum, (who has countersued), has hired Harvard law prof Charlie Nesson, whose law school team is employing a full range of social networking and IT tools to effectively embarrass the RIAA, which has since the start of the trial abandoned its policy of suing downloaders. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:53 am
Sony BMG Music Entertainment is suing Joel Tenenbaum, a graduate student at Boston University, for alleged copyright infringement. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
US District Court Judge Nancy Gertner said she will allow Courtroom View Network - a New York-based company that webcasts trials, primarily in state courts - to chronicle a key hearing Jan. 22 in the suit against the student, Joel Tenenbaum, by a group that represents the US recording industry. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
District Judge Nancy Gertner of Massachusetts granted over-the-internet coverage for a Jan. 22 motions hearing in the RIAA's lawsuit against Boston University student Joel Tenenbaum and others. [read post]
