Search for: "JONES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 281 - 300 of 487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Benjamin Bissell
Foreign Policy features an exclusive scoop today that the US State Department is planning to cut $500,000 in funding for a project investigating Assad’s war crimes. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:42 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the Court’s recent cert. denial in Jones v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am by Kevin LaCroix
”[x] Under the GLBA, financial institutions, in actions brought by the Department of Justice only (there is no private right of action under GLBA), can be fined up to $100,000 for each violation, and directors and officers of financial institutions could be held personally liable for civil penalties of up to $10,000 for each violation. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Section 702 exemption thereby reflects what Justice Brennan calleda “solicitude” for “a means by which a religious community defines itself” in cases where the organization determines that its activities “are in furtherance of an organization’s religious mission, and that only those committed to that mission should conduct them. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by Ritika Singh
FOX News reports that yesterday, the Senate confirmed Stuart Jones as the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, and Robert Beecroft a the U.S. ambassador to Egypt. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Justice Kennedy’s opinion reads much like his opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As I also indicated in the housing discussion, I don’t think TCRR adequately explains the willingness of the Supreme Court to decide Jones v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Reg. 16504 (March 21, 2012) (“The Departments seek comment on which religious organizations should be eligible for the accommodation and whether, as some religious stakeholders have suggested, for-profit religious employers with such  objections should be considered as well. [read post]