Search for: "Jack Stevens"
Results 281 - 300
of 910
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
Steven Weber and Chuck Kapelke provided takeaways from Trump’s recent executive order on cybersecurity. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 3:14 am
And see this Jack Ciesielski blog – and this WSJ article. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Shiffrin, Steven H., The First Amendment, Democracy, and Romance (1990). [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:17 pm
The top ten posts of the term were as follows (in descending order) Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Libel Trial, Day 3: Claimants closing submissions, judgment reserved Defamation Act 2013: A Summary and Overview – Iain Wilson and Max Campbell How to avoid defamation – Steven Price How Dacre and the Mail are making the case for section 40 – Brian… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am
I confess I missed Professor Dorf’s review of Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism, so this is the first I have heard this exact point being made by him, and I think it is worth pondering. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Contact us at inforrmeditorial@gmail.com The top 20 posts of all time are (in descending order) Case Law: PJS v News Group Newspapers, Court of Appeal grants privacy injunction – Sara Mansoori and Aidan Wills Harassment and injunctions: Cheryl Cole – Natalie Peck The cases of Vanessa Perroncel and John Terry – a curious legal affair – Dominic Crossley How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2)… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 2:56 am
Bradley & Jack L. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:23 am
But where they differ–as, for example, Justice Scalia’s conclusions about the original public meaning of the Second Amendment in Heller differed from Justice Stevens’ analysis of original framers intent–we can criticize a judge for applying a version of originalism we consider to be incorrect, just as we can criticize the judge for employing any other incorrect approach to constitutional interpretation. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
SEC Reduces Whistleblower Bounty Based On Culpability And Delayed Reporting by Harris Mufson, Steven J. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 4:25 am
Jack Reed, voiced opposition to Thursday’s package of bills, with Ms. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:19 pm
Jack Goldsmith is fairly described as the polar opposite of an alarmist. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:19 am
Jack Goldsmith argued that the Trump administration’s purported draft executive order on detention and interrogation will probably give the administration a symbolic boost but is largely self-defeating. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
With Jack’s gracious permission, we use this blog post to set out some basic findings. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:11 am
Appraising the “Merger Price” Appraisal Rule Posted by Albert Choi, Virginia Law School, and Eric Talley, Columbia Law School, on Friday, January 6, 2017 Tags: Acquisitions, Agency costs, Appraisal rights, Arbitrage, Auctions, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware law, Fair values, Firm valuation, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting Global and Regional Trends in Corporate Governance for 2017 Posted by Jack… [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 10:33 pm
Apple VP Phil Schiller spoke with Steven Levy of Backchannel, and the result was a really interesting article. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:27 pm
Strip Jack, Ian Rankin 32. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 6:27 pm
Strip Jack, Ian Rankin 32. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Ryan Dolby-Stevens (Olswang), Natalie Hall (CMS), Jonathan Scrine (Nabarro), Jack Ballantyne (Olswang), Clementine Bottet (Nabarro) & Cathryn Hopkins (Olswang). 16.32: James Eadie QC submits that any control by Parliament of the royal prerogative has been via express provision. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Steven Barnett is Professor of Communications at the University of Westminster. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The New Jersey Law Journal (registration or subscription required), Steven Sanders discusses Beckles v. [read post]
