Search for: "Jacob v. Jacob"
Results 281 - 300
of 2,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
In the didactic genre (or subgenre), “mirrors for princes,” philosophers instruct kings and princes how to rule. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 5:16 am
McGeary v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 1:52 pm
Long Lake Twp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:43 pm
This post was authored by Christopher Guercio, Jacob D. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:30 pm
This post was authored by Victor Gesuele of Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In Mallory v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Rev. 56, 63–66 (2015) (suggesting after King v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 7:48 am
Jefferson Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2022, 7:57 pm
This post was authored by Jennifer Autar, Jacob D. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:15 pm
This post was authored by Katherine Baurs-Krey, Jacob D. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:21 pm
Padecky v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:28 pm
Ocean Bay Mart, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:31 am
This post was authored by Sonia Canales, Jacob D. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
”[9] The Supreme Court reiterated this definition in Basic v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 9:05 am
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
That is what trade dress protection can accomplish.In their fascinating new essay, "The Coca-Cola Bottle: A Fragile Vessel for Building a Brand," which is forthcoming in Legal Applications of Marketing Theory (Gersen & Steckel, eds), Jacob Gersen and Scott Hemphill tell the history of how The Coca-Cola Company (hereafter "Coke") secured lock-tight trade dress protection in the distinctive shapes of its bottles. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:13 am
From Weiss v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:19 am
He loses the case.The case is Brook v. [read post]